Predicting organoleptic scores of sub-ppm flavour notes.Part 1. Theoretical and experimental details

Abstract

Most existing electronic nose systems have limited commercial application since they only provide a relative description of the flavour under investigation, rather than one against a universal standard. However, the development of a set of universally accepted standards for flavour description has been problematic due to the lack of any comprehensive model relating the molecular structure of an odorant with its flavour-impact during the act of perception. Instead, industries have tended to develop their own flavour models (flavour terminology systems) for specific consumer products that are based upon practical experience of a particular foodstuff, cosmetic, or beverage. We report here on the novel application of chemical multi-sensor arrays to the prediction of organoleptic flavour notes, as defined under a specific terminology system suitable for describing and communicating specific flavours. A novel odour mapping scheme is proposed that may be applied generally to multi-sensor arrays and provides more detailed characterisation of odour quality than is currently achievable. As part of our study, a flow injection analyser (FIA) system has been developed that combines chemical and electronic hardware driven by a microcomputer to achieve accurate and independent control over odour-stream temperature, flow-rate and flow profile, sensor head temperature, and sample times. An array of 24 conducting polymer sensors (11 different types) is used within the FIA system giving an overall experimental coefficient of variation below 7%. The application of this odour mapping technique is demonstrated by way of an experimental study, using the FIA system reported here. The details for this study are given in Part 1, and the computational analysis of the data is carried out in Part 2 (T. C. Pearce and J. W. Gardner, Analyst, 1998, 123, 2057.

References

1. T. Aishima and S. Nakai, Food Rev. Int., 1991, 7(1), 33.
2. J. E. Amoore, Chem. Senses, 1977, 2, 267.
3. C. L. Ham and P. C. Jurs, Chem. Senses, 1985, 10(4), 491.
4. R. H. Wright, Chem. Senses, 1976, 2, 203.
5. K. J. Rossiter, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 3201.
6. P. C. Jurs, C. L. Ham and W. E. Brugger, in Odor Quality and Chemical Structure: Based on a Symposium of the 178th Meeting of the American Chemistry Society, Washington, DC, September 13, 1979, ed. H. R. Moskowitz and C. B. Warren, American Chemical Society, USA, 1981, p. 143.
7. S. S. Schiffman, in Odor Quality and Chemical Structure: Based on a Symposium of the 178th Meeting of the American Chemistry Society, Washington, DC, September 13, 1979, ed. H. R. Moskowitz and C. B. Warren, American Chemical Society, USA, 1981, p. 1.
8. H. Stone and J. L. Sidel, Sensory Evaluations Practices, Academic Press, London, 1985.
9. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice E1432 for Defining and Calculating Individual and Groups Sensory Thresholds From Forced-Choice Data Sets of Intermediate Size, ASTM, Philadelphia, USA, 1991.
10. M. C. Meilgaard, Master Brewers Association of America (MBAA) Technical Quarterly, 1991, 28, 132.
11. T. C. Pearce, J. W. Gardner and W. Göpel, in Sensors Update 3, ed. W. Göpel, J. Hesse and H. Baltes, J. Wiley, New York, 1997, p. 62.
12. C. DiNatale, A. Macagnano, R. Paolesse, E. Tarizzo, A. D'Amico, F. Davide, T. Boschi, M. Faccio, G. Ferri, F. Sinesio, F. M. Bucarelli, E. Moneta and G. B. Quaglia, in Proceedings 1997 International Conference on Solid-state Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, June 16–19, 1997, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1982, vol. 2, p. 1335.
13. S. S. Schiffman and H. T. Nagle, in Abstracts XXth Annual Meetings for the Association of Chemoreception Sciences, Sarasota, Florida, April 22–26, 1998. AChemS, Sarasota, FL, 1998, p. 264.
14. ASBC Technical Committee and Editorial Committee, Methods of Analysis of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, ASBC, St. Paul, USA, 1976.
15. J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, Exploration in Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988pp. 319–362.
16. J. S. Bridle, in Neurocomputing, Algorithms, Architectures and Applications, ed. F. F. Soulie and J. Herault, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, p. 227.
17. M. C. Denham and P. J. Brown, Applied Statistics, 1993, 42, 515.
18. J. W. Gardner, P. N. Bartlett and K. F. Pratt, IEE Proc.—Circuits Devices Syst., 1995, 142, 321.
19. S. S. Stevens, Psychophysics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
20. S. D. Brown, T. B. Blank, S. T. Sum and L. G. Weyer, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 315R.
21. T. C. Pearce, J. W. Gardner, S. Friel, P. N. Bartlett and N. Blair, Analyst, 1993, 118, 371.
22. N. Blair, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK, 1995.
23. A. C. Pike, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Warwick, West Midlands, UK, 1996.
24. J. M. Elliot, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton, Hampshire, UK, 1997.
25. J. W. Gardner and P. N. Bartlett, Sens. Actuators A, 1995, 51, 1.
26. J. W. Gardner, C. R. Lloyd, A. C. Pike, J. E. Brignell, P. Scivier, P. N. Bartlett, A. J. Duke and J. M. Elliot, Sens. Actuators B, 1998, 48, 290.
27. P. Ingleby, J. W. Gardner and P. N. Bartlett, in Eurosensors XII, Southampton, September 13–16 1998, ed. N. M. White, Institute of Physics, London, in press.
28. T. C. Pearce, Bio Syst., 1997, 41(2), 43.
29. J. W. Gardner, T. C. Pearce, S. Friel, P. N. Bartlett and N. Blair, Sens. Actuators B, 1994, 18–19, 240.
30. P. Heggerty, personal communication, 1996.
31. T. C. Pearce and J. W. Gardner, Analyst, 1998, 123, 2057.