Sensitive determination of paraquat and diquat at the sub-ng ml–1 level by continuous amperometric flow methods

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Matilde Luque, Angel Ríos and Miguel Valcárcel


Abstract

Two methodologies are described for the determination of paraquat and diquat. The first is based on the pre-treatment of an electrode with a surfactant solution, which improves the electrochemical determination of the herbicides. Linear calibration graphs were obtained in the ranges 10–80 and 10–100 ng ml–1 for paraquat and diquat, respectively. The limits of detection were 6.32 for paraquat and 4.80 ng ml–1 for diquat. The method was applied to the determination of the herbicides in synthetic water samples. The second methodology is based on the preconcentration of paraquat and diquat in a minicolumn packed with a cation-exchange material. The determination ranges and detection limits depend on the sample volume used (5–50 ml). Thus, 50 ml of sample provides limits of detection of 0.016 and 0.020 ng ml–1 for paraquat and diquat, respectively. The applicability of the method was demonstrated with the determination of the herbicides in both synthetic and real water samples.


References

  1. B. D. Ripley and A. S. Y. Chau, Analysis of Pesticides in Water, vol. III. Nitrogen Containing Pesticides, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1982 Search PubMed.
  2. D. Bullock, Analytical Methods for Pesticides and Plant Glowth Regulators, vol. 6, Academic Press. London, 1972 Search PubMed.
  3. A. Calderbank and S. H. Yuen, Analyst, 1965, 90, 99 RSC.
  4. S. H. Yuen, J. E. Bagness and D. Myles, Analyst, 1967, 92, 375 RSC.
  5. M. Ganesan, S. Natesan and V. Ranganathan, Analyst, 1979, 104, 258 RSC.
  6. E. H. Guijarro, P. Y. Sedeño and L. M. P. Díez, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1987, 199, 203 CrossRef.
  7. P. Shivare and U. K. Gupta, Analyst, 1991, 116, 391 RSC.
  8. A. J. Cannard and W. J. Criddle, Analyst, 1975, 100, 848 RSC.
  9. Y. Kawano, J. Audino and M. Edlund, J. Chromatogr., 1975, 115, 289 CrossRef CAS.
  10. D. C. Paschal, L. H. Needham, Z. J. Rollen and J. A. Liddle, J. Chromatogr., 1979, 177, 85 CrossRef CAS.
  11. P. Y. Sedeño, J. M. P. Carrazon and L. M. P. Diez, Mikrochim. Acta, 1985, 3, 279.
  12. R. A. Braithwaite, Hum. Toxicol., 1987, 6, 83 Search PubMed.
  13. E. Alvarez, M. T. Sevilla, J. M. Pinilla and L. Hernández, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1992, 260, 19 CrossRef CAS.
  14. J.-H. Zen, S.-H. Jeng and H.-J. Chen, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 498 CrossRef CAS.
  15. J. J. Pesek and I. E. Leigh, Chemically Modified Surfaces, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1994 Search PubMed.
  16. A. Malquory and A. Radaelli, Ital. Agric., 1996, 104, 35 Search PubMed.
  17. M. Agudo, A. Ríos and M. Valcárcel, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1993, 281, 103 CrossRef CAS.
  18. M. Agudo, A. Ríos and M. Valcárcel, Quím. Anal., 1993, 12, 100 Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.