Evaluation of the determination of mercury at the trace and ultra-trace levels in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl by flow injection–cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry using SnCl₂ and NaBH₄ as reductands

Abstract

The influence of different concentrations of NaCl (0–20%m/v) on the analytical figures of merit for the determination of mercury by flow injection–CVAAS was studied. The determination was performed with and without preconcentration by gold amalgamation and by employing different reducing agents, NaBH₄ and SnCl₂. When using the reductand SnCl₂, stable operation both with and without preconcentration was obtained, resulting in RSDs below 5% (n ⩾ 30), even in the presence of high concentrations of NaCl. Without preconcentration the sensitivity was a function of the concentration of NaCl (between 0.033 and 0.013 ml ng^–1). With preconcentration the sensitivity could be improved by a factor of 2.5 (i.e., from 0.084 to 0.037 ml ng^–1, depending on the concentration of NaCl). With the reducing agent NaBH₄, sufficient stability for routine analysis was observed only without preconcentration (RSD ⩽ 2%, n = 45) and a sensitivity of 0.022 ml ng^–1 was obtained for matrix-free solutions. In the presence of high concentrations of NaCl the sensitivity increased up to 0.030 ml^–1 ng, but owing to the unsystematically unstable blank values it was not a monotonic function of the concentration of NaCl. The use of preconcentration in the case of NaBH₄ was hampered by the gold trap being covered with gaseous reaction products or entrained droplets as a result of the generation of foam in the gas–liquid separator. This could be improved by the use of two gas-washing bottles (NaOH, H₂O). With the different methods, for which the detection limits finally were between 15 and 230 pg ml^–1 (without) and 2 and 11 pg ml^–1 (with preconcentration), mercury was determined in five standard reference samples of soil and sedimented sludge at the ng g^–1 to µg g^–1 level subsequent to their dissolution with aqua regia.

References

1. P. J. Craig, Organometallic Compounds in the Environment, Longman, Harlow, 1986.
2. M. Hempel, Y. K. Chau, B. J. Dutka, R. McInnis, K. K. Kwan and D. Liu, Analyst, 1995, 120, 721.
3. P. Koppe and A. Stozek, Kommunales Abwasser, Vulkan Verlag, Essen, 2nd edn., 1990.
4. W. L. Clevenger, B. W. Smith and J. D. Winefordner, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem., 1997, 27, 1 and references cited therein.
5. Z. Fang and T. Guanhong, Analyst, 1996, 11, 1 and references cited therein.
6. M. S. Adams, H. Kausch, T. Gaumert and K.-E. Krüger, Environ. Conserv., 1996, 23, 35.
7. DIN 38414, Part 7, Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser- und Schlammuntersuchung, VCH, Weinheim, 1983.
8. H. Mertens and A. Althaus, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1985, 316, 696.
9. DIN EN 1483, Part 12, Deutsche Einheitsverfahren zur Wasser-, Abwasser-, und Schlammuntersuchung, VCH, Weinheim, 1997.
10. H. Kaiser and H. Specker, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1956, 149, 44.