Determination of benzene and associated volatile compounds in mainstream cigarette smoke

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Keith G. Darrall, John A. Figgins and Richard D. Brown


Abstract

There is continuing interest, by health professionals and individuals, in the composition of mainstream tobacco smoke. Regular official surveys of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields are from time to time supplemented by special surveys of specific components. In this study, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to identify and quantify benzene and certain other volatile compounds of interest in the mainstream smoke of 26 cigarette brands on the UK market and of smoke from hand rolled tobacco. Validation of the method adopted demonstrated the ability to identify and to measure reliably the yields of benzene and seven other compounds: toluene, ethylbenzene, m/p-xylene, o-xylene, styrene, isoprene and acrylonitrile. Yields of these analytes were ranked and compared with the tar yields of the brands. In general terms, brands yielding ≤3 mg of tar yielded proportionately more of the vapour phase analytes than did brands yielding >3 mg of tar per cigarette. For many of the higher tar brands the yield of vapour phase analyte was approximately proportional to the tar yield. Smoking cigarettes with an average yield of 50 µg of benzene per cigarette has been compared with the occupational maximum exposure limit (16 mg m–3) concentration and with US studies on the home environment. Smoking the majority of brands examined could contribute significantly to the population exposure of benzene and the other volatile organic compounds considered in this study.


References

  1. UK Smoking Statistics, ed. Wald, N., Kiryluk, S., Darby, S., Doll, R., Pike, M. and Peto, R., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988, Tables 8.1–8.13 Search PubMed.
  2. Third Report of the Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health, HM Stationary Office, London, 1983 Search PubMed.
  3. G. F. Phillips and R. E. Waller, Food Chem. Toxicol., 1991, 29, 469 CrossRef CAS.
  4. P. R. Houlgate, K. S. Dhingra, S. J. Nash and W. H. Evans, Analyst, 1989, 114, 355 RSC.
  5. P. R. Houlgate and W. H. Evans, Analyst, 1989, 114, 71 RSC.
  6. W. H. Evans, N. C. Thomas, M. C. Boardman and S. J. Nash, Sci. Total Environ., 1993, 136, 101 CrossRef CAS.
  7. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, IARC, Lyon, 1982, vol. 29, pp. 93–148 Search PubMed.
  8. G. D. Byrd and K. W. Fowler, J. Chromatogr., 1990, 503, 359 CrossRef CAS.
  9. K. D. Brunnemann, M. R. Kagen, J. E. Cox and D. Hoffman, Exp. Pathol., 1989, 37, 108 Search PubMed.
  10. International Standards Organization, (a) Smoking Protocols, ISO 4387:1991; (b) Water Analysis, ISO 10362-1:1991; (c) nicotine analysis, ISO 10315:1991; (d) cigarette conditioning, ISO 3402:1991, ISO, Geneva, 1991.
  11. K. D. Brunnemann, M. R. Kagen, J. E. Cox and D. Hoffman, Carcinogenesis, 1990, 11, 1863 CAS.
  12. W. Horwitz, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1980, 63, 1344 Search PubMed.
  13. K. G. Darrall and J. A. Figgins, Tobacco Control, in the press Search PubMed.
  14. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, EPA Method 524.2 (Revision 4.0), US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 1992 Search PubMed.
  15. L. A. Wallace, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 1995, 25, 4 CAS.
  16. Occupational Exposure Limits 1997, EH40/97 Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Information Centre, London, 1997 Search PubMed.
  17. J. Angerer, G. Scherer, K. Schaller and J. Muller, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1991, 339, 740 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.