Speciation of airborne dust from a nickel refinery roasting operation†

Abstract

Earlier work-related lung and nasal cancer studies included estimates of exposures to different nickel species in the refinery. Based on the metallurgy, only insoluble nickel was believed to be present around the roasters but mixed exposure was assumed in most areas, including the tankhouse. Occasional leaching tests of samples from the roaster area have indicated the presence of soluble nickel. This study reports on five parallel sets of dust samples collected from different floors with standard equipment and treated as follows. Two sets were leached with an ammonium citrate buffer at pH 4.4. Undissolved material was treated with HClO₄/HNO₃, evaporated to dryness and dissolved in HCl. Ni, Cu, Co, Fe, Se, and As were determined in both fractions. Water soluble Ni was found in all samples, ranging from 5–35%. Sulfate in the solutions correlated nearly stoichiometrically to the total metal content. The three remaining sets were investigated by, respectively, differential leaching, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The percentage of soluble nickel found by differential leaching corresponded well with those obtained by the simplified procedure. X-Ray diffraction analysis showed the presence of NiSO₄·6H₂O as well as oxides of Ni and Cu. This study indicates mixed exposures also in the roaster area. It also clearly indicates that basing exposure on the metallurgy alone can lead to serious misjudgements. The impact of this new information on the interpretation of cancer incidence at this refinery must await the analysis in an ongoing case-reference study.

References

1. A. C. Løken, Tidskr Nor Laegeforen, 1950, 376.
2. E. Pedersen, A. C. Høgetveit and A. Andersen, Int. J. Cancer, 1973, 12, 32.
3. K. Magnus, A. Andersen and A. C. Høgetveit, Int. J. Cancer, 1982, 30, 681.
4. International Committee on Nickel Carcinogenesis in Man, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1990, 16, 1.
5. F. R. Archibald, J. Met, 1982, 14, 648.
6. E. O. Stensholt, H. Zachariasen and J. H. Lund, in Extraction Metallurgy 85, The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London, 1985, p. 377–397.
7. E. O. Stensholt, H. Zachariasen, J. H. Lund and P. G. Thornhill, in Extractive Metallurgy of Nickel and Cobalt, eds. Tyroler, G. P., and Landott, C. A., The Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1988, pp. 403–412.
8. V. J. Zatka, J. S. Warner and K. E. Maskery, Env. Sci. Technol., 1992, 26, 138.
9. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, ACGIH, Cincinatti, OH, 1996.
10. J. K. Dunnick, M. R. Elwell, J. M. Benson, C. H. Hobbs, F. F. Hahn, P. J. Haley, Y. S. Cheng and A. F. Eidson, Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 1989, 12, 584.
11. International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS), Environmental Health Criteria 108, Nickel, WHO, Geneva, 1991, ch. 2 and 3, ISBN 92-4-157108-X.
12. IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Chromium, Nickel and Welding. International Agency on Cancer, Lyon, 1990, vol. 49, p. 318–389. ISBN 92-92-832-1249-5.
13. A. Aitio, Nickel and Nickel Compounds, The Nordic Expert Group for Criteria Documentation of Health Risks from Chemicals 119, 1995, vol. 26, ISBN 91-7045-362-4.