Estimating measurement uncertainty using a cause and effect and reconciliation approachPart 2.† Measurement uncertainty estimates compared with collaborative trial expectation‡

Abstract

Measurement uncertainty estimates are presented for ten analytical methods, covering over 45 combinations of analyte, matrix and concentration. The uncertainty estimates were produced using a cause and effect approach published previously. Techniques include gas and liquid chromatography, elemental analysis by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry, and titrimetry. A range of different types of data is used, including quality control data and method validation studies. The major contributions to the uncertainty for each method and a brief description of their evaluation are given. In most cases, a combination of an experimental estimate of overall precision and the uncertainty associated with overall bias, measured as recovery, across representative sample types and analyte concentrations contributes the majority of the uncertainty, although in several cases it was essential to consider additional factors. The uncertainty estimates are also compared with collaborative trial results where available, and with reproducibility estimates obtained from the Horwitz function.

References

1. S. L. R. Ellison and V. J. Barwick, Analyst, 1998, 123, 1387.
2. S. L. R. Ellison and V. J. Barwick, Accred. Qual. Anal., 1998, 3, 101.
3. Guide To The Expression Of Uncertainty In Measurement, International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993(ISBN 92-67-10188-9).
4. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, Laboratory of the Government Chemist, London, 1995(ISBN 0-948926-08-2).
5. W. Horwitz, Anal. Chem., 1982, 54, 67A.
6. W. D. Pocklington, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1988, 332, 674.
7. G. Lognay, M. Severin, A. Boenke and P. J. Wagstaffe, Analyst, 1992, 117, 1093.
8. G. C. Lognay, J. Pearse, D. Pocklington, A. Boenke, B. Schurer and P. J. Wagstaffe, Analyst, 1995, 120, 1831.
9. W. D. Pocklington, J. Pearse, G. Lognay, P. J. Wagstaffe, A. Boenke and B. Schurer, Report EUR 15278 EN, 1993.
10. W. D. Pocklington, J. Pearse, B. G. Muuse, G. Lognay, A. Boenke, B. Schurer and P. J. Wagstaffe, Report EUR 15277 EN, 1993.
11. EC Council Directive on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Cosmetic Products (76/768/EEC), OJ L262, 27.9.1976, p.169.
12. Sixth Commission Directive Relating to Methods of Analysis Necessary for Checking the Composition of Cosmetic Products (95/32/EC), OJ L178, 28.7.95, p.20.
13. J. W. Weijland, Identification and Determination of Hydroquinone, Hydroquinone Monomethyl Ether, Hydroquinone Monoethyl Ether and Hydroquinone Monobenzyl Ether. EC Collaborative Trial, Cosmetica Report 44, Keuringsdienst van Waren, Enschede, The Netherlands, January, 1990.
14. Collaborative Trial of a Method for the Determination of Arsenic and Antimony in Cot-mattress Materials, LGC report to BSI committee CW/52, Report number 96/520180.
15. The Feeding Stuffs (Sampling and Analysis) Regulations 1982, SI No. 1144, HM Stationery Office, London, 1982.
16. G. Merson and R. Wood, 1995, unpublished work.
17. SCA Booklet, Ammonia in Waters 1981, Method D: The Spectrophotometric Determination of Ammonia in Waters, HM Stationery Office, London, 1981.
18. The Feeding Stuffs (Sampling and Analysis)(Amendment) Regulations 1994, SI 1994 No. 1610, HM Stationery Office, London, 1994.
19. S. L. R. Ellison and A. Williams, in The Use of Recovery Factors in Trace Analysis, ed. M. Parkany, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 1996.
20. M. Pueyo, J. Obiols and E. Vilalta, Anal. Commun., 1996, 33, 205.
21. W. B. Boyer, W. Horwitz and R. Albert, Anal. Chem., 1985, 57, 454.
22. W. Horwitz and R. Albert, J. AOAC Int., 1996, 79, 589.
23. P. Hall and B. Selinger, Anal. Chem, 1989, 61, 1465.
24. M. Thompson and P. J. Lowthian, Analyst, 1993, 118, 1495.
25. IUPAC, Pure Appl. Chem., 1988, 60, 885.
26. AOAC, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1989, 72, 694.