Hydrolysis of phosphomonoesters in nucleotides by cerium(IV) ions. Highly selective hydrolysis of monoester over diester in concentrated buffers

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Sachiko Miyama, Hiroyuki Asanuma and Makoto Komiyama


Abstract

Phosphomonoesters in nucleotides are efficiently hydrolysed by CeIV ions under physiological conditions. The half-lives of the residues at pH 7.2 and 50 °C ([CeIV] = 10 mM) are around 10 min. Phosphomonoester hydrolysis by CeIV ions is faster than the hydrolysis of phosphodiesters. Significantly, the selectivity for monoester hydrolysis over diester hydrolysis is remarkably increased by using concentrated buffer solutions (TRIS and HEPES). In 500 mM TRIS buffer, pdA and dAp are hydrolysed 500- and 580-fold faster than is d(ApA), whereas the corresponding ratios in 50 mM TRIS buffer are 85 and 90 respectively. Selective removal of the terminal monophosphate from d(pApA) is achieved by CeIV in these concentrated buffers.


References

  1. R. L. P. Adams, J. T. Knowler and D. P. Leader, The Biochemistry of Nucleic Acids, 10th edn., Chapman and Hall, London, 1986 Search PubMed.
  2. Reviews: (a) M. Komiyama, J. Biochem., 1995, 118, 665 CAS; (b) R. Breslow, Acc. Chem. Res., 1995, 28, 146 CrossRef CAS.
  3. (a) Y. Matsumoto and M. Komiyama, Nucleic Acids, Symp. Ser., 1992, 27, 33 Search PubMed; (b) M. Komiyama, K. Matsumura, K. Yonezawa and Y. Matsumoto, Chem. Express, 1993, 8, 85 Search PubMed; (c) T. Shiiba, K. Yonezawa, N. Takeda, Y. Matsumoto, M. Yashiro and M. Komiyama, J. Mol. Catal., 1993, 84, L21 CrossRef CAS; (d) B. K. Takasaki and J. Chin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 1121 CrossRef CAS; (e) M. Komiyama, T. Shiiba, T. Kodama, N. Takeda, J. Sumaoka and M. Yashiro, Chem. Lett., 1994, 1025 CAS; (f) M. Komiyama, N. Takeda, Y. Takahashi, H. Uchida, T. Shiiba, T. Kodama and M. Yashiro, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 269 RSC; (g) S. Hashimoto and Y. Nakamura, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 1413 RSC; (h) J. Rammo, R. Hettich, A. Roigk and H.-J. Schneider, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996, 105 RSC and references cited therein.
  4. J. Sumaoka, M. Yashiro and M. Komiyama, J. Chem Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 1755 RSC.
  5. (a) J. Ciesiolka, T. Marciniec and W. Krzyzosiak, Eur. J. Biochem., 1989, 182, 445 CAS; (b) M. Komiyama, K. Matsumura and Y. Matsumoto, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 640 RSC; (c) J. R. Morrow, L. A. Buttrey, V. M. Shelton and K. A. Berback, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1903 CrossRef CAS.
  6. For triester hydrolysis: (a) R. W. Hay and N. Govan, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 714 RSC; (b) S. J. Oh, C. W. Yoon and J. W. Park, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 329 RSC.
  7. For the hydrolysis of other phosphate esters: (a) M. Matsumura and M. Komiyama, J. Inorg. Biochem., 1994, 55, 153 CrossRef CAS; (b) B. K. Takasaki and J. Chin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 8582 CrossRef CAS; (c) Ref. 2.
  8. Hydrolysis of ribonucleoside 2′- and 3′-monophosphates by lanthanide ions has been examined extensively: S. Kuusela and H. Lönnberg, J. Phys. Org. Chem., 1993, 6, 347 Search PubMed.
  9. Monophosphate hydrolysis by metalions other than lanthanide ions has been studied: (a) J. M. Harrowfield, D. R. Jones, L. F. Lindoy and A. M. Sargeson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 7733 CrossRef CAS; (b) D. H. Vance and A. W. Czarnik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 12 165 CrossRef; (c) J. S. Seo, N.-D. Sung, R. C. Hynes and J. Chin, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 7472 CrossRef CAS and references cited therein.
  10. Pioneering works on the catalysis of lanthanide ions for the hydrolysis of phosphomonoesters were carried out about 40 years ago: (a) E. Bamann, H. Trapmann and F. Fischler, Biochem. Z., 1953, 32, 89 Search PubMed; (b) M. Shimomura and F. Egami, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1953, 26, 263 CAS However, these studies were made only in alkaline solutions, and thus the hydrolyses reported were much less efficient than those presented in the present paper. The catalysis by lanthanide ions is notably suppressed at a higher pH than 8, probably due to formation of the precipitates of metal hydroxide.
  11. The ratio of the products in the k2 process depends on which of the two P–O bonds in the internal phosphodiester linkage is cleaved. In the hydrolysis of d(ApA), two P–O linkages are cleaved by CeIV at almost the same rates, providing dAp and pdA in nearly 1∶1 ratio (ref. 3f). These monophosphates are promptly hydrolysed to dA.
  12. The rate of the hydrolysis of methyl phosphate at pH 7 and 25 °C is 5 × 10–10 h–1: J. P. Guthrie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99, 3991 Search PubMed.
  13. The water molecule(s) bound to CeIV should assist the reaction as a general acid catalyst, and the negatively charged transition state for monophosphate hydrolysis is stabilized by the positive charge on the CeIV.
  14. When hydrogen peroxide was added to the reaction mixtures, the substrate was gradually decomposed (the total peak area in HPLC decreased) and varieties of unassignable products were formed. Apparently, some radical species were formed there. The possibility of the participation of some peroxide-like species in the catalysis, proposed in ref. 3d for the DNA hydrolysis by CeCl3–O2 combination, is unlikely (see also refs. 3e and 3f).
  15. The pKa values of adenosine 5′-phosphate are 3.80 and 6.19, whereas the values of the 3′-phosphate are 3.65 and 5.83: Kagaku Binran Kiso-Hen, ed. by Chemical Society of Japan, Maruzen, 1984 Search PubMed.
  16. The binding constants for the complex formation of lanthanide(III) ions with adenosine monophosphate are around 104-fold greater than the corresponding values with dinucleotide: the former values are from Stability Constants Supplement No. 1, Special Publication 25, The Chemical Society, London, 1971, whereas the latter values are from M. Komiyama, N. Takeda, Y. Takahashi, Y. Matsumoto and M. Yashiro, Nucleosides, Nucleotides, 1994, 13, 1297 Search PubMed.
  17. In Fig. 2, each of the monophosphate and the phosphodiester residues is coordinated to one of the CeIV ions in the metal hydroxide cluster. Alternatively, both of them can be coordinated to one CeIV ion.
  18. (a) J. J. Butzow and G. L. Eichhorn, Biochemistry, 1971, 10, 2019 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. Ikenaga and Y. Inoue, Biochemistry, 1974, 13, 577 CrossRef CAS; (c) A. George, P. Draganac and W. R. Farkas, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 3627 CrossRef CAS; (d) V. M. Shelton and J. R. Morrow, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 4295 CrossRef CAS; (e) J. R. Morrow and V. M. Shelton, New J. Chem., 1994, 18, 371 Search PubMed; (f) S. Kuusela, A. Azhayev, A. Guzaev and H. Lönnberg, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1995, 1197 RSC; (g) S. Kuusela, A. Guzaev and H. Lönnberg, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 1895 RSC.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.