17O NMR study of substituent effects in 4-substituted N-chlorobenzamides and comparison with 4-substituted benzamides: sensitivity to ring substituents (ρ) reflects electronic and steric effects

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Michael De Rosa, David W. Boykin and Alfons L. Baumstark


Abstract

Natural abundance 17O NMR spectra of 4-substituted N-chlorobenzamides were obtained in acetonitrile at 75 °C and compared with those for similarly substituted benzamides. An excellent correlation (δ = 5.43σ + + 350.1, r = 0.998) was obtained when the 17O chemical shifts of N-chlorobenzamides were plotted against σ+ and using σ- for the 4-nitro derivative. Based on the greater electronegativity of the N-chloro group the value of ρ observed for N-chlorobenzamides (5.4) would have been expected to be greater compared to that of benzamides (7.3). It is concluded that the 17O chemical shift in N-chlorobenzamides is very sensitive to torsion angle and that is why a low value of ρ is obtained. Sensitivity (ρ) of the chemical shift to ring substituents cannot be used as an unambiguous measure of electronic effects in systems where the torsion angle is greater than zero.


References

  1. M. De Rosa, K. Brown, M. McCoy, K. Ong and K. Sanford, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 1787 RSC.
  2. 17O NMR Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry, ed. D. W. Boykin, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1990 Search PubMed.
  3. (a) A. L. Baumstark, P. Balakrishnan, M. Dotrong, C. J. McCloskey, M. G. Oakley and D. W. Boykin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 1059 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. Suezawa, K. Tsuchiya, E. Tahara and M. Hirota, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1988, 61, 4057 CAS; (c) H. Dahn, P. Péchy and V. V. Toan, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1990, 29, 647 CrossRef; (d) H. Dahn and P. Péchy, J. Chim. Phys., 1992, 89, 1683 CAS; (e) J. Spychla and D. W. Boykin, J. Chem. Res. (S), 1993, 426 Search PubMed.
  4. Unpublished 4-substituted benzamide data used in a preliminary communication 3c and courtesy of Professor H. Dahn.
  5. D. W. Boykin and A. L. Baumstark, ch. 3 in ref. 2.
  6. (a) S. Yamada, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1113 CrossRef CAS; (b) S. Yamada, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 941 CrossRef CAS.
  7. B. Altenkirk and S. S. Israelstram, J. Org. Chem., 1962, 27, 4532 CAS.
  8. C. Hansch, A. Leo and D. Hoekman, Exploring QSAR Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1995 Search PubMed.
  9. M. U. Hassan and M. Arab, Magn. Reson. Chem., 1987, 25, 987.
  10. J. Bromilow, R. T. C. Brownlee, D. J. Craik, P. R. Fiske, J. E. Rowe and M. Sadek, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1981, 753 RSC.
  11. We thank Professor H. Dahn, for this observation.
  12. A similar calculation for a 15 ppm chemical shift range gave a value of ca. 5°.
  13. P. G. Gassman and A. F. Fentiman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92, 2549 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.