Reactivity in eliminative cleavage of activated four-membered rings. The behaviour of 3-hydroxythietane derivatives

Abstract

3-Hydroxythietane derivatives undergo retro-aldol ring fission in aqueous sodium hydroxide at a rate determined by the substituent (H or Ph) at the 3 position and by the oxidation state of sulfur. Reactions occur between 4 × 10⁴ and 5 × 10⁵ times faster than for the open chain analogues. These rate accelerations correlate with an expression of strain energy between 41% and 33% compared with approximately 26% for alkene-forming eliminations of cyclobutanes. These differences, together with the differences in relative sensitivities to α-phenyl substitution and uniformly positive values of entropies of activation for 3-hydroxythietane derivatives, suggest a greater degree of ring cleavage in the transition structure for thietanes than for cyclobutanes. Ring fission is, however, accompanied by concomitant protonation of the leaving carbon group as evidenced by the isotope discrimination value of 1.7 for reaction of 3e. 3-Hydroxythietane itself does not undergo retro-aldol ring cleavage but rather anionic polymerisation to yield polymer 9a.

References

1. L. A. Paquette and C. J. M. Stirling, Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 7383.
2. P. Kaszynski, A. C. Friedli and J. Michl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 601.
3. M. I. Page, in Enzyme Mechanisms, eds. M. I. Page and A. Williams, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1987.
4. (a) C. J. M. Stirling, Tetrahedron, 1985, 41, 1613; (b) S. W. Roberts and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, 170; (c) S. Niedoba, S. M. Jeffery and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1992, 650; (d) S. M. Jeffery and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1993, 1617.
5. M. A. Casadei, C. Galli and L. Mandolini, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 1051.
6. (a) F. Benedetti and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1983, 1374; (b) S. M. van der Kerk, J. W. Verhoeven and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1985, 1355.
7. (a) H. A. Earl and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1987, 1273; (b) A. Bury, H. A. Earl and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1987, 1281.
8. G. Tonachini, F. Bernardi, H. B. Schlegel and C. J. M. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1988, 705.
9. B. Lamm and K. Gustafsson, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B, 1974, 28, 701.
10. F. S. Abbott and K. Haya, Can. J. Chem., 1978, 56, 71.
11. W. O. Siegl and C. R. Johnson, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 35, 3657.
12. D. C. Dittmer and M. E. Christy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1962, 84, 399.
13. J. P. Machon and A. Nicco, Eur. Polym. J., 1971, 7, 353.
14. There is very little information which deals with this assumption.
15. Sussex-N.P.L. Computer Analysed Thermochemical Data: Organic and Organometallic Compounds, J. B. Pedley and J. Rylance, University of Sussex Press, 1977.
16. Quoted by S. Oae and Y. Uchida, in The Chemistry of Sulfoxides and Sulfones, eds. S. Patai, Z. Rappoport and C. J. M. Stirling, Wiley, Chichester, 1988.
17. A. Thibblin and W. P. Jencks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 4963.
18. D. C. Dittmer, B. H. Patwardhan and J. T. Bartholomew, Org. Mag. Reson., 1982, 18, 82.
19. D. R. Dalton and V. P. Dutta, J. Chem. Soc. (B), 1971, 85 This adsorption was immediately quenched on acidification.
20. A. C. Cope, P. Kovacic and M. Burg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71, 3658.
21. E. J. Corey and M. Chaykovsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1965, 87, 1345.
22. H. D. Becker and G. A. Russell, J. Org. Chem., 1963, 28, 1896.