Stable Cu+, Ag+ complexes of aza-bridged macrocyclic molecules: structure and chemical properties

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Hiroyuki Takemura, Noriyoshi Kon, Keita Tani, Kô Takehara, Junko Kimoto, Teruo Shinmyozu and Takahiko Inazu


Abstract

The cage type compounds 1 and 2 form stable Cu+ or Ag+ complexes, which have been employed for the preparation of cation-free host molecules.A reaction between the potassium complex K+⊂1 and a CuII salt generates a CuI complex. The CuII/CuI redox potential is observed at +0.43 V (vs. SCE) in the cyclic voltammetry, which shows that the Cu+ state is stabilized by its rigid molecular skeleton and spatially fixed coordination sites. A reaction between Ag+ and K+⊂2 yields the dinuclear complex 2Ag+⊂2, which has a short Ag+ ·[thin space (1/6-em)]·[thin space (1/6-em)]· Ag + distance (2.78 Å). The halide anions (Cl-, Br-, I-) remove one Ag+ from 2Ag+⊂2 to give Ag+⊂2, but further demetallation does not occur. CV measurements show that these silver complexes are electrochemically stable. Both silver complexes are stable to sunlight. The first preparations of guest-free hosts have been achieved by treating Cu+⊂1 or 2Ag+⊂2 with CN-. Inclusions of neutral guests (NH3, BH3) have been attempted using these guest-free hosts.


References

  1. (a) H. Takemura, T. Shinmyozu and T. Inazu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 1323 CrossRef CAS; (b) H. Takemura, T. Shinmyozu and T. Inazu, Tetrahedron Lett., 1988, 29, 1789 CrossRef CAS; (c) H. Takemura, T. Hirakawa, T. Shinmyozu and T. Inazu, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25, 5053 CrossRef CAS; (d) H. Takemura, T. Shinmyozu and T. Inazu, Coord. Chem. Rev., in press Search PubMed; (e) H. Takemura, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyushu University, 1992.
  2. (a) P. A. Kollman and L. C. Allen, Chem. Rev., 1972, 72, 283 CrossRef CAS; (b) P. A. Kollman and L. C. Allen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1971, 93, 4991 CrossRef CAS; (c) H. J. Berthold, W. Preibsch and E. Vonholdt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 1524 CrossRef.
  3. In this case, an oxidation reaction takes place, but we did not clarify which materials were oxidized.
  4. A benzene analogue of 1 and 2(compound 3, Fig. 8) showed no inclusion ability towards alkali metal ions but formed a Cu+ complex. The cavity has poor ability as a ligand because the cavity size of 3 is 1.8 Å in diameter (half that of 2) and has only four bridgehead nitrogens as donor atoms. The reaction between 3 and Cu(MeCN)4PF6 in MeCN–CH2Cl2 gave colourless crystals. The complex is unstable and easy to decompose under aerobic conditions. Only FAB mass and NMR spectra supported the formation of the complex. Exposure of the complex to air gradually generates metal-free 3 and an inorganic CuII salt. A silver complex of 3 was also formed by the reaction between 3 and AgBF4, but this complex was less stable than the Cu+ complex. Further identification or characterization of the Cu+·3 and Ag+·3 were not carried out because of their lability.
  5. (a) C. Dietrich-Buchecker, J.-P. Sauvage and J.-M. Kern, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 7791 CrossRef CAS; (b) K. T. Potts, M. Keshavarz-K, F. S. Tham, H. D. Abruña and C. R. Arana, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 4422 CrossRef CAS; (c) K. T. Potts, M. Keshavarz-K, F. S. Tham, H. D. Abruña and C. Arana, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 4436 CrossRef CAS.
  6. K. D. Karlin, J. C. Hayes, S. Juen, J. P. Hutchinson and J. Zubieta, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 4106 CrossRef CAS.
  7. (a) C. E. Housecroft, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1992, 115, 141 CrossRef CAS; (b) M. Munakata, M. Maekawa, S. Kitagawa and M. Adachi, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1990, 167, 181 CrossRef CAS.
  8. F. A. Cotton, X. Feng, M. Matusz and R. Poli, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 7077 CrossRef CAS.
  9. P. Jennische and R. Hesse, Acta Chem. Scand., 1971, 25, 423 CAS.
  10. D. J. Cram, T. Kaneda, R. C. Helgeson and G. M. Lein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 6752 CrossRef CAS.
  11. (a) C. O. Dietrich-Bucheker and J.-P. Sauvage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 3043 CrossRef CAS; (b) C. Dietrich-Bucheker and J.-P. Sauvage, Tetrahedron, 1990, 46, 503 CrossRef CAS; (c) J. C. Rodriguez-Ubis, B. Alpha, D. Plancherel and J.-M. Lehn, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1984, 67, 2264 CrossRef CAS.
  12. In a separate experiment, compound 2 was titrated with picric acid. Stoichiometry and shift values of the methylene signals of nH+2(n= 1, 2 and 3) were observed. The results were used for the determination of the number of protons captured in the cavity of 2.
  13. H. Takemura, S. Osada, T. Shinmyozu and T. Inazu, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1996, 277 RSC.
  14. In order to test the basicity of the ligand, a reaction between guest-free 2 and p-TsNH2 in dry DMSO was monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy (pKa= 15.58 in DMSO; K. Izutsu, Acid–Base Dissociation Constants in Dipolar Aprotic Solvents, Chemical Data Series No. 35, IUPAC, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 1990, p. 89). The reaction proceeded very slowly, and broad signals appeared after 16 days. The spectrum at 100 °C showed wellresolved sharp signals which correspond to 3H+2, 2H+2, H+2 and the starting material 2. According to the result, the proton cryptate H+2 is also a strong base itself and further protonation reactions occur Search PubMed.
  15. B. Metz, D. Moras and R. Weiss, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1976, 423 RSC.
  16. E. Graf, J.-P. Kintzinger, J.-M. Lehn and J. LeMoigne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 1672 CrossRef CAS.
  17. teXsan: Crystal Structure Analysis Package, Molecular Structure Corporation ( 1985 and 1992).
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.