Impurity cations in the bulk and the {001} surface of muscovite: an atomistic simulation study

Abstract

Solution energies are calculated for monovalent and divalent impurities in the bulk and the {001} surface of muscovite, using atomistic simulation techniques and a consistent set of interatomic potentials. Cs⁺ is the most soluble alkali metal cation. There are marked differences between the bulk and surface solution energies for the smaller univalent cations, indicating appreciable segregation to the surface. Without deprotonation of an OH group, none of the Group 1 cations are able to enter the hexagonal cavity on the mica basal plane. Small divalent cations are predicted to substitute for octahedral Al with the most favourable charge-balance mechanism involving the additional substitution of Al for Si. The solution mechanism for larger, less soluble divalent cations involves substitution for K⁺ , with a compensating Al/Si exchange. Where possible, results are calculated for two models, the first assuming complete ordering of Al and Si on the tetrahedral aluminosilicate sheets and the second completely random ordering. There is little difference between the values from the two models, with the exception of the {001} surface energy.

References

1. J. A. Purton, N. L. Allan, J. D. Blundy and E. A. Wasserman, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1996, 60, 4977.
2. J. A. Purton, N. L. Allan and J. D. Blundy, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, in press.
3. See, for example, Rev. Mineral., ed. S. W. Bailey, 1984, 13.
4. For an overview of theoretical approaches to the modelling of phyllosilicates, see W. F. Bleam, Rev. Geophys., 1993, 31, 1.
5. C. R. A. Catlow and W. C. Mackrodt, in Computer Simulation of Solids, ed. C. R. A. Catlow and W. C. Mackrodt, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1982, ch. 1.
6. C. R. A. Catlow, in Solid State Chemistry: Techniques, ed. A. K. Cheetham and P. Day, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987, ch. 7.
7. For example, Computer Modelling in Inorganic Crystallography, ed. C. R. A. Catlow, Academic Press, San Diego–London, 1996.
8. For previous mineral simulations see, for example, M. J. Sanders, M. Leslie and C. R. A. Catlow, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1984, 1273; C. R. A. Catlow and G. D. Price, Nature (London), 1990, 347, 243; A. Patel, G. D. Price and M. Mendelssohn, Phys. Chem. Mineral., 1991, 17, 690; B. Winkler, M. T. Dove and M. Leslie, Am. Mineral., 1991, 76, 313; S. C. Parker and G. D. Price, Adv. Solid State Chem., 1989, 1, 295.
9. J. Sanz and J. M. Serratosa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 4790; C. P. Herrero, J. Sanz and J. M. Serratosa, Solid State Commun., 1985, 53, 151.
10. P. Pavlides and C. R. A. Catlow, Mol. Phys., 1994, 81, 1269.
11. B. G. Dick and A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev., 1958, 112, 90.
12. A. B. Lidiard and M. J. Norgett, in Computational Solid State Physics, ed. F. Herman, W. W. Dalton and T. R. Koeler, Plenum, New York, 1972, p. 385.
13. M. Leslie, SERC Daresbury Laboratory Technical Memorandum DL/SCI/TM31T, 1982. A region I size of 8 Å was used throughout.
14. N. F. Mott and M. T. Littleton, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1938, 34, 485.
15. M. Leslie and M. J. Gillan, J. Phys. C, 1985, 18, 973.
16. For example, D. H. Gay and A. L. Rohl, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91, 925.
17. For earlier work considering largely only the electrostatic contribution to the total energy, see, e.g., H. D. B. Jenkins, in Computer Simulation of Solids, ed. C. R. A. Catlow and W. C. Mackrodt, Springer-Verlag, Berlin–Heidelberg–New York, 1982, ch. 16; R. F. Giese Jr., Rev. Mineral., 1984, 13, 105.
18. D. R. Collins and C. R. A. Catlow, Am. Mineral., 1992, 77, 1172 The potential cutoff used is 12 Å.
19. F. A. Kroger and H. J. Vink, Solid State Phys., 1956, 3, 307.
20. For the ionic radii we have taken the values for six-fold coordination from R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1976, 32, 751; As suggested by Babel (D. Babel, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1969, 369, 117) ionic radii for the twelve-coordinate M⁺ and M²⁺ ions have been assumed to be 6% greater than the radii for the same ions when octahedrally coordinated.
21. For example, M. M. Morel and J. G. Hering, Principles and Applications of Aquatic Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1993, p. 557.
22. J. Icenhower and D. London, Am. Mineral., 1995, 80, 1229.
23. F. Bertaut, Compt. Rend., 1958, 246, 3447.
24. S. Nishimura, S. Biggs, P. J. Scales, T. W. Healey, K. Tsunematsu and T. Tateyama, Langmuir, 1994, 10, 4554.
25. U. Hofmann and R. Z. Klemen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1950, 262, 95; R. Green-Kelly, Mineral. Mag., 1955, 30, 604; R. Tettenhorst, Am. Mineral., 1962, 47, 769; W. F. Jaynes and J. M. Bigham, Clays Clay Miner., 1987, 35, 440.
26. M. Volfinger, Bull. Soc. Fr. Minéral Cristallogr., 1975, 98, 49.
27. C. V. Guidotti, Rev. Mineral., 1984, 13, 357.
28. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1976, 32, 751.
29. R. A. Knurr and S. W. Bailey, Clays Clay Miner., 1986, 34, 7.
30. M. T. Vaughan and S. Guggenheim, J. Geophys. Res., 1986, 92, 4657.
31. M. F. Golop, A. B. Nalivken and A. Vokemenstev, SER Shrencat Natures, 1968, 22, 3.