Investigation of a Correction Procedure for Surface Irregularity Effects Based on Scatter Peak Intensities in the Field Analysis of Geological and Archaeological Rock Samples by Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

PHILIP J. POTTS, PETER C. WEBB and OLWEN WILLIAMS-THORPE


Abstract

Discrepancies arise in the analysis by portable XRF of geological and archaeological rock samples that have irregular shaped surfaces, because the instrument is calibrated for the quantitative analysis of flat samples. A simple correction procedure was investigated to overcome these discrepancies in which the measured intensity is normalised by the ratio of the scatter peak intensity from a compositionally similar flat reference sample to the scatter peak intensity measured from the sample itself. The scatter peak data were obtained from the55Fe, 109Cd and 241Am sources incorporated in the instrument used for this investigation. Under controlled conditions, this correction has proved to be successful in compensating for effective air gaps of up to 3 mm in the analysis of the K lines of higher atomic number elements (Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, Nb, Ba) and up to 1 mm for the Fe K line. Low energy K lines are affected by air attenuation in the air gap, which is not accounted for in this simple model. The scatter peak from the 55Fe source is preferred for the correction because its intensity is least dependent on sample composition, but the 109Cd scatter peak can be used instead with more careful matching of the composition of the flat sample used to derive the reference scatter peak intensity. Apart from additional air attenuation, the principle limitations to the application of this method to larger air gaps were (i) the change in scatter angle and, therefore, relative scatter intensity as the air gap is increased and (ii) the increasing contribution from scatter in air, particularly to the measured 55Fe scatter peak at larger air gaps between sample and analyser.


References

  1. M. O. Stallard, S. E. Apitz and C. A. Dooley, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 1995, 31, 297 CrossRef CAS.
  2. R. W. Puls, D. A. Clark, C. Carlson and J. Vardy, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 1994, 14, 111 Search PubMed.
  3. R. P. Swift, Spectroscopy, 1995, 10, 31 Search PubMed.
  4. M. B. Bernick and P. R. Campagna, J. Hazard. Mater., 1995, 43, 91 CrossRef CAS.
  5. J. H. Reeves, R. J. Arthur, R. L. Brodzinski and C. L. Shepard, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1995, 193, 93 CAS.
  6. D. L. Hardison, C. O. Whitaker, J. D. Neefus, E. D. Estes, W. F. Gutknecht, S. L. Harper, M. E. Beard and D. J. von Lehmden, Evaluation of Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer for Measurement of Lead in Paint, Soil and Dust, US Environmental Protection Agency Report, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, EPA/600/A-92/245, 1993, p. 11 Search PubMed.
  7. R. Cesareo, G. E. Gigante, J. S. Iwanczyk and A. Dabrowski, Nucl. Instrum. Methods, Sect. A, 1992, 322, 583 Search PubMed.
  8. P. J. Potts, P. C. Webb, O. Williams-Thorpe and R. Kilworth, Analyst, 1995, 120, 1273 RSC.
  9. P. J. Potts and R. Hussey, J. Radioanal. Chem., 1983, 78, 339 CAS.
  10. O. Williams-Thorpe, P. J. Potts and P. C. Webb, unpublished work.
  11. R. D. Giauque, F. Asaro, F. H. Stross and T. R. Hester, X-ray Spectrom., 1993, 22, 44 CAS.
  12. P. Berry, TN Technologies, personal communication.
  13. E. P. Bertin, Principles and Practice of X-ray Spectrometric Analysis, Plenum, New York, 1975 Search PubMed.
  14. J. P. Willis, in: X-ray Fluorescence Analysis in the Geological Sciences, Advances in Methodology, ed. Ahmedali, S. T., Geological Association of Canada Short Course, Memorial University, St. Johns, NF, Canada, 1989, vol. 7, pp. 91–140 Search PubMed.
  15. J. Leroux and T. P. Thinh, Revised Tables of X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients, Corporation Scientifique Claisse, Quebec, 1977 Search PubMed.
  16. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, ed. Weast, R. C., CRC Press, Cleveland, OH, 57th edn., 1973 Search PubMed.
  17. P. J. Potts, A. G. Tindle and P. C. Webb, Geochemical Reference Material Compositions, Whittles Publishing/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1992 Search PubMed.
  18. P. J. Potts, O. Williams-Thorpe and P. C. Webb, Geostand. Newsl., in the press Search PubMed.
  19. R. Jenkins, R. W. Gould and D. Gedcke, Quantitative X-ray Spectrometry, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2nd edn., 1995 Search PubMed.
  20. G. W. Grodstein, X-ray Attenuation Coefficients from 10 keV to 100 MeV, NBS Circular 583, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1957 Search PubMed.
  21. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, ed. Lide, D. R., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 75th edn., 1995 Search PubMed.
  22. R. W. Ryan and J. D. Zahrt, in: Handbook of X-ray Spectrometry, ed. van Grieken, R. E., and Markowicz, A. A., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993, ch. 10, pp. 491–515 Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.