Long-range electron-transfer reaction rates to cytochrome c across long- and short-chain alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers: Electroreflectance studies

Abstract

The kinetics of electron transfer (ET) between cytochrome c and a gold (111) electrode through self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiols with terminal carboxylic acid groups, COOH(CH₂)_nSH, have been studied for n=2–11 using an ac potential-modulated UV–VIS reflectance spectroscopic technique (electroreflectance spectroscopy, ER). For 9⩽n⩽11, the standard ET rate constant, k_app, depends exponentially on the chain lengths and the exponential decay factor is 1.09 per methylene group; for n<9, however, k_app deviates from the exponential plot. The ET reaction through short-chain alkanethiol monolayers is controlled by the preceding chemical reaction. The rate-controlling step is very likely to be the reorganization of cytochrome c to the favourable conformation for the ET reaction. The ET reaction rate constant from cytochrome c in the favourable conformation to the electrode surface obeys Marcus theory for long-range ET. The ET reaction through long-chain alkanethiol monolayers is controlled by the ET rate through alkanethiols.

References

1. T. T.-T. Li and M. J. Weaver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 6107.
2. H. O. Finklea and D. D. Hanshew, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 3173.
3. C. E. D. Chidsey, Science, 1991, 251, 919.
4. C. E. D. Chidsey, C. R. Bertozzi, T. M. Putvinski and A. M. Mujsce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 4301.
5. H. O. Finklea, M. S. Ravenscroft and D. A. Snider, Langmuir, 1993, 9, 223.
6. H. O. Finklea and M. S. Ravenscroft, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 3843.
7. J. N. Richardson, S. R. Peck, L. S. Curtin, L. M. Tender, R. H. Terrill, M. T. Carter and R. W. Murray, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 766.
8. R. A. Marcus and N. Sutin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1985, 811, 265.
9. C. Miller, P. Cuendet and M. Grätzel, J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95, 877.
10. A. M. Becka and C. J. Miller, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 2657.
11. J. F. Smalley, S. W. Feldberg, C. E. D. Chidsey, M. R. Linford, M. D. Newton and Y.-P. Liu, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 13141.
12. S. Song, R. A. Clark, E. F. Bowden and M. J. Tarlov, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 6564.
13. R. A. Clark, T. M. Nahir and E. F. Bowden, The Electrochemical Society Meeting, Reno, Nevada, May 21–26, 1995, extended abstract, p. 953.
14. Prof. E. F. Bowden, personal communication.
15. Z. Q. Feng, S. Imabayashi, T. Kakiuchi and K. Niki, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1995, 394, 149.
16. Z. Q. Feng, T. Sagara and K. Niki, Anal. Chem., 1995, 67, 3564.
17. D. L. Brautigan, S. Fergason-Miller and E. Margoliash, Methods Enzymol., 1978, 33.
18. E. B. Troughto, C. D. Bain, G. H. Whitesides, R. G. Nuzzo, D. L. Allara and M. D. Porter, Langmuir, 1988, 4, 365.
19. T. Sagara, S. Igarashi, H. Sato and K. Niki, Langmuir, 1991, 7, 1005.
20. T. Sagara, H. Sato and K. Niki, Benseki Kagaku, 1991, 40, 641.
21. T. Sagara, K. Niwa, A. Sone, C. Hinnen and K. Niki, Langmuir, 1990, 6, 254.
22. J. R. Winkler and H. B. Gray, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 369.