Alessandro Cavaglioni and Renzo Cini
Reactions of [RhIIICl2Ph(SbPh3)3] 1 with an excess of purine-6-thione (C5H4N4S) or 1,3-thiazole (C3H3NS) in absolute ethanol gave crystalline [RhIIICl2Ph(C5H4N4 S)(SbPh3)] 2 (S trans to Sb), [RhIIICl2Ph(SbPh3)(C3H 3NS)2] 3 and [RhIIICl2Ph(SbPh3)2(C 3H3NS)] 4. The crystal structure of complex 2 has been determined. Two different rotamers, which differ in the orientation of the phenyl ligand around the Rh–C bond axis, are present. The co-ordination geometry of both molecules is pseudo-octahedral and the neutral, N1 and N9 protonated, purine ligand behaves as bidentate through S and N7. The Rh–N7 bonding interaction is much weakened [average 2.262(7) Å] by the high trans influence of the phenyl ligand. The H8 atom of both purine systems points towards the centre of a phenyl ring of SbPh3. The geometrical parameters of the SbPh3 molecules show that an attractive interaction between H8 and the phenyl ring is operative for each rotamer. The 1H NMR spectrum of 2, in DCON(CD3)2, shows an upfield shift of 1.37 ppm for H8, consistent with a shielding effect from a phenyl ring of SbPh3. Therefore, the H8 · · · Ph(Sb) attractive interaction exists also in solution. The crystal structure of 3 has also been determined. The co-ordination geometry is pseudo-octahedral, the metal being linked to two trans chloride ions, one antimony donor from SbPh3, one carbon atom from the phenyl ligand and two nitrogen atoms from thiazole ligands, one of which is trans to Ph [Rh–N 2.245(5) Å]. The 1H NMR spectrum shows that the solid-state structure is maintained in CDCl3 solution. The signals of the H2 and H5 protons of the thiazole ligands are shifted downfield by 0.65 and 0.63 and 0.45 and 0.45 ppm for the molecules trans and cis to the C donor, respectively, upon complexation. The 1H HMR spectrum of 4 is in agreement with the presence of a thiazole ligand trans to Ph. An interaction between the chloride ligands and some protons of the phenyl rings of SbPh3 is resposible for a downfield chemical shift of about 0.2 ppm for the relevant 1H NMR signals in compounds 1–4. Molecular mechanics analysis based on the crystal structures of 2 and 3 made it possible to set up force-field parameters suitable for this class of molecules. In the case of 3 the rotation of the SbPh3 molecule around the Rh–Sb bond is highly hindered; the lowest barrier between minima is higher than 125 kJ mol-1. The rotations of the thiazole ligands have minima consistent with the crystal structure.