Chris J. Adams, Michael I. Bruce, Brian W. Skelton, Allan H. White, Gilles Frapper and Jean-François Halet
The reaction between
[Ru5(µ5-C2)(µ-SMe)2(
µ-PPh2)2(CO)11] 1 and CO (30
atm) yielded
[Ru5(µ4-C2)(µ-SMe)2(
µ-PPh2)2(CO)13] 2 and
[Ru4(µ4-C2)(µ-SMe)2(
µ-PPh2)2(CO)10] 3, both
characterised by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. In 2,
addition of 2CO results in the net cleavage of two Ru–Ru
bonds and expansion of the resulting Ru3 cluster. The
C2 ligand bridges one edge of the Ru3 core and the
isolated Ru–Ru bonded fragment in a
µ,µ-η1,η2 mode, albeit with asymmetric
Ru–C2 π interactions. In 3, one Ru atom has
been excised from the cluster present in 1. One Ru–Ru bond
is bridged by two SMe groups as a result of migration of one of these.
Although the C2 ligand bridges all four metal atoms, only two
Ru
–
Ru bonds are present, with the non-bonded
Ru
·
·
·
Ru vector being
bridged by PPh2. Extended-Hückel molecular orbital
calculations have been used to rationalise the observed structures.