Determination of Formaldehyde by Conversion to Hexahydrooxazolo[3,4-a]pyridine in a Denuder Tube With Recovery by Thermal Desorption, and Analysis by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry†

Abstract

The implications for formaldehyde analysis arising from a recent study where the inter-laboratory relative standard deviation for formaldehyde [CAS Registry number: 50-00-0] monitoring was reported to fall in the range 20 to 60% are discussed. A thermal desorption approach is proposed as a possible way to address the requirement for less intensive sample processing in formaldehyde analysis; as well as meeting other important criteria such as reduced sample handling and increased overall sensitivity. A denuder tube coated with 2-hydroxymethylpiperidine [CAS Registry number: 3433-37-2] and connected to an adsorbent sampler packed with Tenax TA was used to derivatise formaldehyde vapour. The volatile derivative, hexahydrooxazolo[3,4-a]pyridine [CAS Registry number: 274-50-0], was retained on the adsorbent trap. Analysis of the derivative was accomplished using a thermal desorption technique coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. To test the approach a test atmosphere generator based on a permeation tube containing α-polyoxymethylene was constructed. A dilution chamber heated to 80 °C was used to prevent repolymerisation of the released formaldehyde. Gravimetric measurements indicated that formaldehyde was generated at a rate of 1.9 × 10^–4 g h^–1 (95% confidence limits = ± 1 × 10^–6 h^–1) and atmospheres of formaldehyde at concentrations of 5.92, 3.35 and 1.79 mg m^–3, with a water concentration less than 17 mg m^–3 at 20 °C and 1.013 kPa were validated using NIOSH Method 3500 for formaldehyde determination. Formaldehyde masses in the range 0.1 to 16 µg were sampled using the system described. The contents of the adsorbent trap were then analysed. The data obtained supported the hypothesis that formaldehyde derivatives could be recovered in an analytically useful way by thermal desorption. Mass spectrometric data confirmed previous assignments for hexahydrooxazolo[3,4-a]pyridine and that thermal decomposition did not occur to a detectable extent during desorption. The relationships between mass sampled and instrument response were linear up to the point of breakthrough, with limits of detection in the range 0.03 to 0.51 mg m^–3 formaldehyde in air.

References

1. World Health Organisation, Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, European Series No. 23, WHO Regional Publications, Copenhagen, 1987.
2. Health and Safety Executive, HSE EH40/91 Occupational Exposure Limits 1991, Health and Safety Executive, London, 1991.
3. T. G. Mathews, A. R. Hawthorne, T. C. Howell and C. E. Metcalfe, Environ. Int., 1982, 8, 143.
4. C. J. Shirtliffe, M. Z. Rousseau, I. C. Young, J. F. Silwinski and P. G. Sim, Formaldehyde, Analytical Chemistry and Toxicology, Advances in Chemistry Series 210, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1985.
5. L. Molhave, Indoor Air Pollution by Formaldehyde in European Countries, European Concerted Action Report 7, EUR 13216 EN, Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1990.
6. E. Goelen, M. Lambrechts and F. Geyskens, Analyst, 1997, 122, 411.
7. R. Otson and P. Fellin, Sci. Total Environ., 1988, 77, 95.
8. A. Vairavamurthy, J. M. Roberts and L. Newman, Atmos. Environ., 1992, 26A, 1965.
9. L. H. Keith, G. L. Patton, D. L. Lewis and P. G. Edwards, Principles of Environmental Sampling, ed. Keith, L. H., 2nd edn., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1996, ch. 1.
10. A. Yasuhara and T. Shibamoto, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1989, 72, 899.
11. Handbook of Derivatives for Chromatography, ed. Blau, K., and Halket, J. M., 2nd edn., Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1993.
12. W. L. Crider, N. P. Barkley, M. J. Knott and R. W. Slater, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1969, 47, 237.
13. M. Ferm, Atmos. Environ., 1979, 13, 1385.
14. Z. Ali, C. L. P. Thomas and J. F. Alder, Analyst, 1989, 114, 759.
15. M. Possanzini, P. Ciccioli, V. Di Palo and R. Draisel, Chromatographia, 1987, 23, 829.
16. F. Cecchini, A. Febo and M. Possanzini, Anal. Lett., 1985, 18, 681.
17. E. R. Kennedy, P. F. O'Connor and Y. T. Gagnon, Anal. Chem., 1984, 56, 2120.
18. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, Method 2541, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
19. F. R. Walker, Formaldehyde, 2nd edn., Reinhold Publishing, New York, USA, 1964.
20. M. H. Ho, Formaldehyde, Analytical Chemistry and Toxicology, ed. Turoski, V., Advances in Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1985.
21. NIOSH, Manual of Analytical Methods, Method 3500, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, USA, 1989.
22. J. C. Miller and J. N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, 2nd edn., Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1988.