Optimization of a Flow Injection Differential Potentiometric System with Two Identical Electrodes for the Determination of Calcium Ion in Water With Improved Sensitivity

Abstract

An experimental optimization by the modified simplex method of a flow injection analysis (FIA) system for the differential potentiometric determination of calcium ion in water is reported. The performances of the optimized system and of an equivalent conventional potentiometric FIA system are compared. The most important features of the proposed system are a substantial increase in sensitivity (from about 28 to about 50 mV per decade) in the linear response range (10^–4–10^–2 mol l^–1 in both cases) and better repeatability (0.5 and 0.8% versus 1.7 and 1.9%, respectively, at 1 × 10^–3 and 6.2 × 10^–4 mol l^–1 calcium ion). The influence of the ionic strength is discussed, showing that it significantly affects the accuracy of the results. The relative accuracy of the differential system was demonstrated by the determination of the calcium content of drinking waters in parallel with an ASTM certified method.

References

1. J. Růžička and E. H. Hansen, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1975, 78, 145.
2. J. Růžička and E. H. Hansen, Flow Injection Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1978.
3. W. Frenzel, Analyst, 1988, 113, 1039.
4. K. Cammann, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1988, 329, 691.
5. C. M. Couto, L. J. F. C. Lima and C. B. S. M. Montenegro, VIII Encontro Luso-galego de Química, Vairão, 1994, Abstracts Book, Com. 7.01.
6. F. Zuther, B. Ross and K. Cammann, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 313, 83.
7. I. Rizov and L. Ilcheva, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 311, 175.
8. H. Müller and V. Müller, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1986, 180, 30.
9. H. Müller and J. Kramer, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1989, 335, 210.
10. J. Alonso, J. Bartroli, M. del Valle, A. A. S. C. Machado and L. M. B. C. Álvares-Ribeiro, J. Chemometrics, 1988, 3, 249.
11. L. M. B. C. Álvares-Ribeiro, A. A. S. C. Machado, J. Alonso, J. Bartroli and M. del Valle, Talanta, 1993, 40, 1113.
12. J. Alonso, J. Bartroli, J. L. F. C. Lima and A. A. S. C. Machado, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1986, 179, 503.
13. E. Pretsch, D. Ammann, H. F. Osswald, M. Guggi and W. Simon, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1980, 63, 191.
14. U. Schefer, D. Ammann, E. Pretsch, U. Oesch and W. Simon, Anal. Chem., 1986, 58, 2282.
15. A. A. S. C. Machado, Analyst, 1994, 119, 2263.
16. C. J. Dowle, B. G. Cooksey, J. M. Ottaway and W. C. Campbell, Analyst, 1988, 113, 117.
17. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.01, Water and Environmental Technology, ASTM, Philadelphia, 1989, p. 313.
18. J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, Comput. J., 1965, 7, 308.
19. J. Alonso, J. Bartroli, J. Coello and M. Del Valle, Anal. Lett., 1987, 20, 1247.
20. W. Spendley, G. R. Hext and F. R. Himsworth, Technometrics, 1962, 4, 441.
21. L. A. Yarbro and S. N. Deming, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1974, 73, 391.
22. P. B. Ryan, R. L. Barr and H. D. Todd, Anal. Chem., 1980, 52, 1460.
23. E. R. Aberg and A. G. T. Gustavsson, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1982, 144, 39.
24. D. Betteridge, A. P. Wade and A. G. Howard, Talanta, 1985, 12, 723.
25. R. J. Forster and D. Diamond, Anal. Chem., 1992, 64, 1721.
26. D. L. Massart, A. Dijkstra and L. Kaufman, Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures. A Survey of Statistical and Mathematical Techniques, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978, Ch. 5.