Determination of Aluminium-26 in Biological Materials by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Studies of the biological chemistry of aluminium can gain significantly from the use of the long-lived isotope ²⁶Al as a tracer, although the cost of the isotope often precludes its determination by radiochemical counting techniques. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) provides an ultra-sensitive method of determination, free from isobaric interference from atomic (²⁶Mg) or molecular species. The source materials for AMS can be aluminium oxide or phosphate, both of which can be readily prepared at a sufficient level of purity from biological substrates. Natural aluminium (²⁷Al, 100%) is added to the preparations as a chemical yield monitor and to provide the reference for the isotope ratio measurement. ²⁶Al/²⁷Al ratios can be determined over the range 10^–14–10^–7, implying a limit of detection for ²⁶Al of around 10^–18 g. The precision of measurement and long-term reproducibility are <5% and <7% (RSD), respectively. Chemical methodologies for routine measurements on blood and urine samples have been developed.

References

1. T. P. Flaten, A. C. Alfrey, J. D. Birchall, J. Savory and R. A. Yokel, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 1996, 48, 527.
2. A. E. Litherland, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser A, 1987, 323, 5.
3. J. P. Day, J. Barker, S. J. King, R. V. Miller, J. Templar, J. S. Lilley, P. V. Drumm, G. W. A. Newton, L. K. Fifield, J. O. H. Stone, G. L. Allan, J. A. Edwardson, P. B. Moore, I. N. Ferrier, N. D. Priest, D. Newton, R. J. Talbot, J. H. Brock, L. Sanchez, C. B. Dobson, R. F. Itzhaki, A. Radunovic and M. W. B. Bradbury, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1994, 92, 463.
4. L. K. Fifield, T. R. Ophel, J. R. Bird, G. E. Calf, G. B. Allison and A. R. Chivas, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1987, 29, 114.
5. R. C. Reedy, C. Tuniz and D. Fink, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Section B, 1994, 92, 335.
6. R. E. M. Hedges, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1990, 52, 428.
7. J. S. Vogel and K. W. Turtletaub, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1994, 92, 445.
8. D. Elmore, M. H. Bhattacharyya, N. Sacco-Gibson and D. P. Peterson, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1990, 52, 531.
9. J. Barker, J. P. Day, T. W. Aitken, T. R. Charlesworth, R. C. Cunningham, P. V. Drumm, J. S. Lilley, G. W. A. Newton and M. J. Smithson, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1990, 52, 540.
10. J. P. Day, J. Barker, L. J. A. Evans, J. Perks and P. J. Seabright, Lancet, 1991, 337, 1345.
11. S. J. King, J. P. Day, P. B. Moore, J. A. Edwardson, G. A. Taylor, L. K. Fifield and R. G. Cresswell, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Ser. B, 1997, 123, 254.
12. N. D. Priest, D. Newton, J. P. Day, R. J. Talbot and A. J. Warner, Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 1995, 14, 287.
13. N. D. Priest, R. J. Talbot, J. G. Austin, J. P. Day, S. J. King, L. K. Fifield and R. G. Cresswell, Biometals, 1996, 9, 221.
14. L. K. Fifield, R. G. Cresswell, M. L. di Tada, T. R. Ophel, J. P. Day, A. P. Clacher, S. J. King and N. D. Priest, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1996, 117, 295.
15. L. K. Fifield, A. P. Clacher, K. Morris, S. J. King, R. G. Cresswell, J. P. Day and F. R. Livens, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Ser. B, 1997, 123, 400.
16. L. K. Fifield, G. L. Allan, J. O. H. Stone and T. R. Ophel, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1994, 92, 85.
17. L. K. Fifield, T. R. Ophel, G. L. Allan, J. R. Bird and R. F. Davie, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 1990, 52, 233.
18. K. Brand, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., 1977, 141, 519.
19. R. Middleton, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., 1984, 220, 105.
20. A. Vogel, A Textbook of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, Longmans, London, 1978, 3rd edn., p. 516.
21. H. C. Eshelman, J. A. Dean, O. Menis and T. C. Rains, Anal. Chem., 1959, 31, 183.