Infrared Discrimination of Enantiomerically Enriched and Racemic Samples of Methamphetamine Salts

Abstract

A relatively rapid and simple means of enantiomer determination is described for the determination of methamphetamine, a common drug of abuse. The method employs the well known technique of infrared transmission spectrometry on solid samples dispersed within an alkali metal halide matrix. This approach exploits the solid-state, ion-exchange reaction between methamphetamine hydrochloride and a potassium iodide matrix and the subsequent formation of the hydriodide salt in situ. The infrared properties of the hydriodide salt are distinct for enantiomerically enriched and racemic samples, and therefore are readily distinguished by infrared transmission spectrometry. This technique uses materials and instrumentation that are generally available to most crime laboratories. The applicability of this method to some other amine drugs is discussed.

References

1. Proposed 1995 Guideline Amendments, 60 Federal Register 25074.
2. A. Allen and T. S. Cantrell, Forensic Sci. Int., 1989, 42, 183.
3. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ed. Horwitz, W., Association of Official Analysis Chemists, Arlington, VA, 10th edn., 1965, p. 597.
4. T. C. Kram and I. S. Lurie, Forensic Sci. Int., 1992, 55, 131.
5. M. J. LaBelle, C. Savard, B. A. Dawson, D. B. Black, L. K. Katyal, F. Zrcek and A. W. By, Forensic Sci. Int., 1995, 71, 215.
6. C. E. Wells, J. Ass. Off. Anal. Chem., 1970, 53, 113.
7. F. T. Noggle and C. R. Clark, J. Forensic Sci., 1986, 31, 732.
8. Y. Makino, S. Ohta and M. Hirobe, Forensic Sci. Int., 1996, 78, 65.
9. I. S. Lurie, J. Chromatogr., 1992, 605, 269.
10. I. Lurie, R. Klein, T. Dal Cason, M. LaBelle, R. Brenneisen and R. Weinberger, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 4019.
11. A. Allen and D. Cooper, Microgram, 1979, 12, 24.
12. R. L. Shriner, R. C. Fuson and D. Y. Curtin, The Systematic Identification of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1964, pp. 256–259.
13. J. Jacques, A. Collet and S. H. Wilen, Enantiomers, Racemates, and Resolutions, Krieger, Malabar, FL, 1994, pp. 43–48.
14. J. S. Chappell, Forensic Sci. Int., 1995, 75, 1.
15. R. A. Ely, Drug Enforcement Administration, San Francisco, CA, USA, personal communication, 1993.
16. N. B. Colthup, L. H. Daly and S. E. Wiberly, Introduction to Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, Academic Press, New York, 1964, pp. 281–282.
17. J. A. Heagy, Drug Enforcement Administration, San Francisco, CA, USA, personal communication, 1996.
18. J. A. Heagy, Anal. Chem., 1970, 42, 1459.
19. For review, see L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 3rd edn., 1960, pp. 449–504.
20. B. Chenon and C. Sandorfy, Can. J. Chem., 1958, 36, 1181.
21. C. Brissette and C. Sandorfy, Can. J. Chem., 1960, 38, 34.