Issue 2, 1995

Hexapole state selection and focusing vs. brute force orientation of beam molecules

Abstract

The commonly used method of orienting polar molecules in a beam, by state selection and focusing with an electrostatic hexapole lens, is compared with the recently introduced orientation method by means of a strong, homogeneous, electric field, based on second- and higher-order Stark effects. The latter, so-called brute force orientation technique, has proved much more effective than had been assumed until recently, and increasingly so if the beam molecules are rotationally very cold.

The properties of both techniques are illustrated by a number of examples. The wider applicability and technically simpler implementation of the brute force orientation technique is offset by the absence of state selection. For the description of the molecular orientational distribution this means that, in general, more parameters are needed than for a molecule selected in a single quantum state.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995,91, 205-214

Hexapole state selection and focusing vs. brute force orientation of beam molecules

J. Bulthuis, J. J. van Leuken and S. Stolte, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91, 205 DOI: 10.1039/FT9959100205

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements