Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 40, 2013
Previous Article Next Article

Secondary structure and rigidity in model proteins

Author affiliations

Abstract

There is tremendous interest in understanding the role that secondary structure plays in the rigidity and dynamics of proteins. In this work we analyze nanomechanical properties of proteins chosen to represent different secondary structures: α-helices (myoglobin and bovine serum albumin), β-barrels (green fluorescent protein), and α + β + loop structures (lysozyme). Our experimental results show that in these model proteins, the β motif is a stiffer structural unit than the α-helix in both dry and hydrated states. This difference appears not only in the rigidity of the protein, but also in the amplitude of fast picosecond fluctuations. Moreover, we show that for these examples the secondary structure correlates with the temperature- and hydration-induced changes in the protein dynamics and rigidity. Analysis also suggests a connection between the length of the secondary structure (α-helices) and the low-frequency vibrational mode, the so-called boson peak. The presented results suggest an intimate connection of dynamics and rigidity with the protein secondary structure.

Graphical abstract: Secondary structure and rigidity in model proteins

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 20 Mar 2013, accepted on 08 Aug 2013 and first published on 09 Aug 2013


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C3SM50807B
Soft Matter, 2013,9, 9548-9556

  •   Request permissions

    Secondary structure and rigidity in model proteins

    S. Perticaroli, J. D. Nickels, G. Ehlers, H. O'Neill, Q. Zhang and A. P. Sokolov, Soft Matter, 2013, 9, 9548
    DOI: 10.1039/C3SM50807B

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements