Issue 5, 2016
From the journal:

Chemical Science

Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04866D

Marcus C. Durrant ORCID logo a  

a Department of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
E-mail: marcus.durrant@northumbria.ac.uk

Abstract

A graphical abstract is available for this content

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04866D

About
Cited by
Related
Download options Please wait...

Associated articles

Article information

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC00859C
Article type
Comment
Submitted
24 Feb 2016
Accepted
25 Feb 2016
First published
25 Feb 2016
This article is Open Access

All publication charges for this article have been paid for by the Royal Society of Chemistry
Creative Commons BY license

Chem. Sci., 2016,7, 3448-3449

Permissions

Request permissions

Reply to the ‘Comment on “A quantitative definition of hypervalency”’ by R. D. Harcourt and T. M. Klapötke, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C5SC04866D

M. C. Durrant, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 3448 DOI: 10.1039/C6SC00859C

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements