Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance work on Wednesday 22nd May 2019 from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM (GMT).

During this time our website performance may be temporarily affected. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 2, 2014
Previous Article Next Article

“Did something happen to you over the summer?”: tensions in intentions for chemistry education

Author affiliations

Abstract

This paper examines teachers' experiences in responding to a new Chemistry curriculum in the province of Manitoba in Canada informed by a ‘tetrahedral’ orientation (Mahaffy, 2005) as a pedagogical framework for the teaching of Chemistry. This tetrahedral orientation endorses macroscopic, microscopic, symbolic and human element teaching and learning experiences and, considering that most Chemistry teaching typically focuses on the symbolic level (Johnstone, 1991), affords a much more diversified Chemistry teacher pedagogy and student-centred learning experience. The teachers self-selected for this study were a part of a larger group of 74 participants in a five-year professional development initiative focusing on fostering the enactment of the intended Chemistry curriculum with its tetrahedral orientation. These teachers were those whose orientations to teaching were statistically significantly different from other participants, as evidenced in the ‘narrowing’ of their teaching practice to, predominantly, a symbolic representation for their Grade 12 classes in contrast to their more diversified practice in Grade 11. Using Aoki's reference to ‘tensionality’ (1986), the study focuses on elucidating the tensions the teachers experienced in working in the space between Chemistry ‘curriculum-as-planned and curriculum-as-lived’. Implications of this study in relation to Chemistry education curriculum policy and practice are discussed.

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 21 Oct 2013, accepted on 18 Dec 2013 and first published on 20 Dec 2013


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C3RP00133D
Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014,15, 142-155

  •   Request permissions

    “Did something happen to you over the summer?”: tensions in intentions for chemistry education

    B. Lewthwaite, T. Doyle and T. Owen, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 142
    DOI: 10.1039/C3RP00133D

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements