Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 29, 2015
Previous Article Next Article

Poly(ether–amide) vs. poly(ether–imide) copolymers for post-combustion membrane separation processes

Author affiliations

Abstract

This work is focused on the comparison between the commercial polyamide PEBAX® MH 1657 and a new set of synthetized polyimides with different polyethylene glycol lengths. The samples were synthesized with the same poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) content (57 wt%) for comparison with the commercial polymer. All polymers have been characterized by several techniques revealing a direct relationship between crystallinity, PEO length and permeability properties. Results at temperatures lower than the Tm of the polyether blocks confirm that lower PEO crystallinity corresponds to higher permeability. At temperatures higher than the Tm of the PEO block, no significant differences were found between the commercial polyamides and the synthesized polyimides. This confirms that the aliphatic phase controls the separation while the hard block provides mechanical strength. Remarkable are the results for the CO2/N2 separation. These new copolyimides are promising materials for post-combustion processes.

Graphical abstract: Poly(ether–amide) vs. poly(ether–imide) copolymers for post-combustion membrane separation processes

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 22 Jan 2015, accepted on 18 Feb 2015 and first published on 19 Feb 2015


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA01328C
Author version
available:
Download author version (PDF)
Citation: RSC Adv., 2015,5, 22310-22318
  • Open access: Creative Commons BY license
  •   Request permissions

    Poly(ether–amide) vs. poly(ether–imide) copolymers for post-combustion membrane separation processes

    A. Tena, S. Shishatskiy and V. Filiz, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 22310
    DOI: 10.1039/C5RA01328C

    This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. Material from this article can be used in other publications provided that the correct acknowledgement is given with the reproduced material.

    Reproduced material should be attributed as follows:

    • For reproduction of material from NJC:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and the RSC.
    • For reproduction of material from PCCP:
      [Original citation] - Published by the PCCP Owner Societies.
    • For reproduction of material from PPS:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf of the European Society for Photobiology, the European Photochemistry Association, and RSC.
    • For reproduction of material from all other RSC journals:
      [Original citation] - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Information about reproducing material from RSC articles with different licences is available on our Permission Requests page.

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements