Issue 6, 2013

Reply to “A further study of acetylacetone nitrosation”

Abstract

The work presented herein constitutes a reply to the comments raised by Iglesias et al. on the mechanistic nature of acetylacetone nitrosation. Their sources of experimental error as well as several inconsistencies and critical factors neglected by these authors are discussed. Likewise, the additional evidence provided in this argumentation supports the mechanism originally proposed and not the alternative postulated by Iglesias et al.

Graphical abstract: Reply to “A further study of acetylacetone nitrosation”

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
31 Aug 2012
Accepted
21 Nov 2012
First published
21 Nov 2012

Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013,11, 1065-1070

Reply to “A further study of acetylacetone nitrosation”

L. García-Río, M. Parajó and M. Pérez-Lorenzo, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 1065 DOI: 10.1039/C2OB26719E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements