Issue 9, 2004

Reactive glow discharges: comparison of steady-state versus pulsed operation

Abstract

In this work we compare glow discharges using traditional, inert gases and alternative reactive gases. More specifically, argon is systematically replaced by nitrogen (or oxygen) at increasing levels, culminating in a plasma completely sustained by nitrogen (or oxygen). To decouple the reactive plasma processes from potentially reactive surface reactions, we employed gold as a non-reactive cathode material. A common trend with nitrogen and oxygen addition is the significant loss of the Ar and ArH ion signals. As the argon ion signal decreases, the molecular oxygen ion increases; however the molecular nitrogen ion does not exhibit the same trend. Our studies include monitoring ions produced in the glow discharge, comparing direct current and pulsed discharges, and evaluating sputter rates.

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
26 Apr 2004
Accepted
14 Jul 2004
First published
23 Aug 2004

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2004,19, 1268-1274

Reactive glow discharges: comparison of steady-state versus pulsed operation

E. P. Hastings and W. W. Harrison, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2004, 19, 1268 DOI: 10.1039/B406292M

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements