Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 4, 2001
Previous Article Next Article

Author affiliations


For the evaluation of different analytical methods the best achievable final uncertainty can be used as the criterion. Evaluation of an analytical method on this basis includes the magnitude and also the robustness of the uncertainty budget. This evaluation was applied to laboratory-scale migration experiments on soil columns. These experiments were performed in order to estimate soil transport parameters of heavy metal pollutants (cadmium). In these studies a tracer (stable 111Cd isotope), having nearly the same physico-chemical properties as the pollutant of concern, was added on top of a contaminated soil and the column effluents were fractionally collected at the bottom. This paper presents three different calculation models, derived from the isotope dilution equation, for the simultaneous determination of the concentration tracer cadmium, [Cdt], and indigenous cadmium, [Cdn], in soil column effluents with ICP-MS. The methods differ in the method of calculation but are, in principal, based on the same measurements. The uncertainty budgets of the different methods were used in the evaluation. In addition to the magnitude of the total uncertainty, the boundary conditions of some parameters were investigated in detail. The influence of the following parameters on the uncertainty budget was studied: the concentration level of cadmium, the isobaric interference of tin and the molar fraction of indigenous cadmium.

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 26 Oct 2000, accepted on 01 Feb 2001 and first published on 21 Mar 2001

Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/B008674F
J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001,16, 307-314

  •   Request permissions

    Total uncertainty budget as method evaluation criterion for the determination of tracer (111Cd) cadmium and indigenous cadmium in soil column effluents with ICP-MS

    K. Tirez, M. Berglund, P. Seuntjens and N. De Brucker, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2001, 16, 307
    DOI: 10.1039/B008674F

Search articles by author