Issue 8, 2020

Photodecay of guaiacol is faster in ice, and even more rapid on ice, than in aqueous solution

Abstract

Snowpacks contain a wide variety of inorganic and organic compounds, including some that absorb sunlight and undergo direct photoreactions. How the rates of these reactions in, and on, ice compare to rates in water is unclear: some studies report similar rates, while others find faster rates in/on ice. Further complicating our understanding, there is conflicting evidence whether chemicals react more quickly at the air–ice interface compared to in liquid-like regions (LLRs) within the ice. To address these questions, we measured the photodegradation rate of guaiacol (2-methoxyphenol) in various sample types, including in solution, in ice, and at the air–ice interface of nature-identical snow. Compared to aqueous solution, we find modest rate constant enhancements (increases of 3- to 6-fold) in ice LLRs, and much larger enhancements (of 17- to 77-fold) at the air–ice interface of nature-identical snow. Our computational modeling suggests the absorption spectrum for guaiacol red-shifts and increases on ice surfaces, leading to more light absorption, but these changes explain only a small portion (roughly 2 to 9%) of the observed rate constant enhancements in/on ice. This indicates that increases in the quantum yield are primarily responsible for the increased photoreactivity of guaiacol on ice; relative to solution, our results suggest that the quantum yield is larger by a factor of roughly 3–6 in liquid-like regions and 12–40 at the air–ice interface.

Graphical abstract: Photodecay of guaiacol is faster in ice, and even more rapid on ice, than in aqueous solution

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
30 May 2020
Accepted
29 Jun 2020
First published
16 Jul 2020

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2020,22, 1666-1677

Author version available

Photodecay of guaiacol is faster in ice, and even more rapid on ice, than in aqueous solution

T. Hullar, F. C. Bononi, Z. Chen, D. Magadia, O. Palmer, T. Tran, D. Rocca, O. Andreussi, D. Donadio and C. Anastasio, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2020, 22, 1666 DOI: 10.1039/D0EM00242A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements