Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance work on Wednesday 27th March 2019 from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM (GMT).

During this time our website performance may be temporarily affected. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 10, 2014
Previous Article Next Article

Reply to the ‘comment on “$ per W metrics for thermoelectric power generation: beyond ZT”’ by G. Nunes, Jr, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C3EE43700K

Author affiliations

Abstract

The comment by Nunes suggests a welcome refinement to an approximation made in the original paper. We show here that Nunes' refinement is identical to a modified effective thermal conductivity, keff = k(1 + γZT), where k is the thermal conductivity, ZT is the usual material figure of merit, and γ is in the range 0.4–0.5. This form of keff was already identified in Section 3.3 of our original paper as an option to improve the accuracy of the calculations and is itself an approximation to the more sophisticated keff analysis of Baranowski, Snyder, and Toberer [J. Appl. Phys. 113, 204904 (2013)]. As noted by Nunes and ourselves, the main downside of such refinements is that they complicate the universality of the main result, the universal cost surface in Fig. 2 of the original paper. The simplified results in the original manuscript are justified and reasonable for ZT ∼ 1 or less, for physical insight, scaling, and rapid screening. For the best accuracy in real systems, exact numerical solutions of the coupled cost and power equations are most appropriate, examples of which we have recently published for 30 bulk and thin film materials in Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 32, 313–327, 2014.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘comment on “$ per W metrics for thermoelectric power generation: beyond ZT”’ by G. Nunes, Jr, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C3EE43700K

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 09 Apr 2014, accepted on 06 Aug 2014 and first published on 11 Aug 2014


Article type: Comment
DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01119H
Author version
available:
Download author version (PDF)
Citation: Energy Environ. Sci., 2014,7, 3441-3442

  •   Request permissions

    Reply to the ‘comment on “$ per W metrics for thermoelectric power generation: beyond ZT”’ by G. Nunes, Jr, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, DOI: 10.1039/C3EE43700K

    S. K. Yee, S. LeBlanc, K. E. Goodson and C. Dames, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 3441
    DOI: 10.1039/C4EE01119H

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements