Issue 5, 2013

Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films?

Abstract

Resistivities of thin polymer films increase abruptly with decreasing thickness, although the corresponding decline in resistance plateaus below a certain thickness. One can jump to the incorrect conclusion that quantum confinement and surface scattering are responsible for this behaviour, and we highlight the pitfalls of committing such an error.

Graphical abstract: Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Communication
Submitted
21 Sep 2012
Accepted
23 Nov 2012
First published
26 Nov 2012

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013,15, 1364-1368

Is ballistic transportation or quantum confinement responsible for changes in the electrical properties of thin polymer films?

J. Veder, K. Patel, J. Lee, M. Tanzirul Alam, M. James, A. Nelson and R. De Marco, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 1364 DOI: 10.1039/C2CP43333H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements