Jump to main content
Jump to site search
Access to RSC content Close the message box

Continue to access RSC content when you are not at your institution. Follow our step-by-step guide.

Issue 11, 2004
Previous Article Next Article

Are Hartree–Fock atoms too small or too large?

Author affiliations


We address the simple question, whether Hartree–Fock atoms are smaller or larger than exact (Schrödinger) atoms. As a measure, we use 〈r2〉. We study the ground state of the atoms He–Kr. The unrestricted Hartree–Fock method is used. To obtain the Schrödinger values we use the finite field CASPT2 approach, and the full CI scheme where possible. CASSCF calculations are also reported. Very large basis sets are employed. We find that for those atoms for which the CASSCF wavefunction is distinct from the HF wavefunction, the Schrödinger values are distinctly smaller than the HF values. Most other atoms are also smaller than the HF values, (or the same within a numerical uncertainty), the exceptions being the hard atoms N–Ne, and Cl, Ar and Kr. We interpret our results in terms of categories of correlation contribution. It is also of interest to test the performance of density functional theory (DFT); we find on the whole that the predictions are good, with B3LYP giving close agreement with finite field CASPT2 for nearly all atoms, in particular for the transition metals.

Back to tab navigation

Article information

26 Feb 2004
08 Apr 2004
First published
20 Apr 2004

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004,6, 2928-2931
Article type

Are Hartree–Fock atoms too small or too large?

A. J. Cohen, N. C. Handy and B. O. Roos, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004, 6, 2928
DOI: 10.1039/B402989P

Social activity

Search articles by author