Issue 5, 1986

Correlation between fluorescent polarisation immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay of anticonvulsant drugs, and stability of calibration graphs

Abstract

Quality control materials and serum samples from patients on long-term drug therapy were analysed for anticonvulsant drugs by enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) and fluorescence polarisation immunoassay (TDX). The accuracy and precision of the two procedures were studied and the stability of calibration graphs was evaluated over a 30-d period. The accuracy and precision of both assays were satisfactory over the therapeutic ranges of phenobarbitone, primidone, phenytoin and carbamazepine and there was a good correlation between the results obtained by EMIT and TDX; for sodium valproate the accuracy and precision of the EMIT assay were poor. Calibration graphs generated by the TDX procedure were found to be stable, but with the EMIT procedure, calibration graphs for phenobarbitone, carbamazepine and sodium valproate showed considerable drift.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Analyst, 1986,111, 517-523

Correlation between fluorescent polarisation immunoassay and enzyme immunoassay of anticonvulsant drugs, and stability of calibration graphs

N. Ratnaraj, V. D. Goldberg and P. T. Lascelles, Analyst, 1986, 111, 517 DOI: 10.1039/AN9861100517

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements