Aromaticity and antiaromaticity in the cyclic 6π and 4π molecules of carbon and silicon E6H6 and E4H4 (E = C, Si)
Abstract
Quantum chemical calculations using density functional theory at the BP86/def2-TZVPP level are reported for the structures and aromaticities of the monocyclic molecules E6H6 and E4H4 (E = C, Si). The results reveal drastic differences between the carbon and silicon homologues. Benzene (1b) is the global energy minimum on the C6H6 PES whereas planar D6h Si6H6 (2d) is not an energy minimum and the D3d form 2c is higher in energy than the prismane isomer 2a. There is an ubiquitous number of stable phenyl compounds but the only experimentally known Si6R6 compound has the structure of the tricyclic species 2b, which is lower in energy than 2c. In sharp contrast, the homologous carbon isomer 1c is more than 120 kcal mol−1 higher in energy than 1b. The carbon compounds C6H6 and C4H4 show a characteristic preference for substitution reaction of benzene 1b and for addition reaction of cyclobutadiene 3a. The Si6H6 silicon homologue 2c has a weaker preference for substitution reaction than benzene, but also tetrasilacyclobutadiene 4a prefers substitution over the addition reaction. The comparison of the calculated (pseudo) π conjugation of the cyclic compounds and acyclic reference systems suggests aromatic stabilization/destabilization for the carbon systems. The values for the silicon compounds are inconclusive and the separation of σ and π interactions is difficult due to the strong deviation of some silicon systems from planarity. The NICS values are not a reliable indicator for aromatic stabilization due to π conjugation. Chemical bonding models that have been developed and derived for compounds in the first octal series of the periodic table are only suitable to a limited extent for molecules with heavier main group atoms. This comes from the radii of the s/p valence orbitals of the atoms, which are very similar for the first octal row atoms leading to effective sp hybridization. The chemical bonds of the heavier atoms have a much higher p character because the radius is bigger than the valence s orbitals.

Please wait while we load your content...