Issue 28, 2024

Dicobalt(ii) helices kill colon cancer cells via enantiomer-specific mechanisms; DNA damage or microtubule disruption

Abstract

Highly diastereoselective self-assembly reactions give both enantiomers (Λ and Δ) of anti-parallel triple-stranded bimetallic Co(II) and Co(III) cationic helices, without the need for resolution; the first such reaction for Co. The complexes are water soluble and stable, even in the case of Co(II). Studies in a range of cancer and healthy cell lines indicate high activity and selectivity, and substantial differences between enantiomers. The oxidation state has little effect, and correspondingly, Co(III) compounds are reduced to Co(II) e.g. by glutathione. In HCT116 colon cancer cells the Λ enantiomer induces dose-dependent G2-M arrest in the cell cycle and disrupts microtubule architectures. This Co(II) Λ enantiomer is ca. five times more potent than the isostructural Fe(II) compound. Since the measured cellular uptakes are similar this implies a higher affinity of the Co system for the intracellular target(s); while the two systems are isostructural they have substantially different charge distributions as shown by calculated hydrophobicity maps. In contrast to the Λ enantiomer, Δ-Co(II) induces G1 arrest in HCT116 cells, efficiently inhibits the topoisomerase I-catalyzed relaxation of supercoiled plasmid DNA, and, unlike the isostructural Fe(II) system, causes DNA damage. It thus seems very likely that redox chemistry plays a role in the latter.

Graphical abstract: Dicobalt(ii) helices kill colon cancer cells via enantiomer-specific mechanisms; DNA damage or microtubule disruption

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Edge Article
Submitted
17 Apr 2024
Accepted
14 Jun 2024
First published
14 Jun 2024
This article is Open Access

All publication charges for this article have been paid for by the Royal Society of Chemistry
Creative Commons BY license

Chem. Sci., 2024,15, 11029-11037

Dicobalt(II) helices kill colon cancer cells via enantiomer-specific mechanisms; DNA damage or microtubule disruption

H. Song, H. Kostrhunova, J. Cervinka, J. Macpherson, J. Malina, T. Rajan, R. Phillips, M. Postings, S. Shepherd, X. Zhang, V. Brabec, N. J. Rogers and P. Scott, Chem. Sci., 2024, 15, 11029 DOI: 10.1039/D4SC02541E

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements