Issue 8, 2024

Comment on “A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods” by E. M. Opodi, X. Song, X. Yu and W. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 11958”

Abstract

The present Comment demonstrates important flaws of the paper Opodi et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 11958 Their crown result (“applicability map”) aims at indicating parameter ranges wherein two approximate methods (called method 2 and 3) apply. My calculations reveal that the applicability map is a factual error. Deviations of I2 from the exact current I1 do not exceed 3% for model parameters where Opodi et al. claimed that method 2 is inapplicable. As for method 3, the parameter range of the applicability map is beyond its scope, as stated in papers cited by Opodi et al. themselves.

Graphical abstract: Comment on “A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods” by E. M. Opodi, X. Song, X. Yu and W. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 11958”

Associated articles

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Comment
Submitted
31 Oct 2022
Accepted
18 Jan 2024
First published
08 Feb 2024
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024,26, 7230-7235

Comment on “A single level tunneling model for molecular junctions: evaluating the simulation methods” by E. M. Opodi, X. Song, X. Yu and W. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 11958”

I. Bâldea, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2024, 26, 7230 DOI: 10.1039/D2CP05110A

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements