Issue 1, 2023

Superhydrophobic microstructures for better anti-icing performances: open-cell or closed-cell?

Abstract

Based on geometrical characteristics, all surface microstructures are categorized into two types: closed-cell and open-cell structures. Closed-cell structures are well-known to have more stable and durable superhydrophobicity at room temperatures. However, in low-temperature environments where massive environmentally induced physical changes emerge, whether closed-cell surfaces can maintain good anti-icing performances has not yet been confirmed, and thus how to design optimal superhydrophobic anti-icing microstructures is rarely reported. Here, we apply an ultrafast laser to fabricate superhydrophobic surfaces with tunable patterned micro-nanostructures from a complete closed-cell to different ratios and to a complete open-cell. We discover that droplets on closed-cell structures completely degrade to the high-adhesion Wenzel state after icing and melting cycles while those on the open-cell structures well recover to the original Cassie-Baxter state. We propose an improved ideal gas model to clarify the mechanisms that the decreased air pocket pressure and the air dissolution on closed-cell structures induce easy impalement during icing and the difficult recovery during melting, paving the way for optimizing the anti-icing structure design. The optimized open-cell surfaces exhibit over 33 times lower ice adhesion strengths (1.4 kPa) and long-term icephobic durability (<20 kPa after 33 deicing cycles) owing to the increased air pocket pressure at low temperatures. Significant dewetting processes during condensation endow the open-cell structures with more remarkable high-humidity resistance and anti-frosting properties. Our study reveals the general design principle of superhydrophobic anti-icing structures, which might guide the design of superhydrophobic anti-icing surfaces in practical harsh environments.

Graphical abstract: Superhydrophobic microstructures for better anti-icing performances: open-cell or closed-cell?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Communication
Submitted
30 Aug 2022
Accepted
31 Oct 2022
First published
02 Nov 2022

Mater. Horiz., 2023,10, 209-220

Superhydrophobic microstructures for better anti-icing performances: open-cell or closed-cell?

L. Wang, G. Jiang, Z. Tian, C. Chen, X. Hu, R. Peng, H. Zhang, P. Fan and M. Zhong, Mater. Horiz., 2023, 10, 209 DOI: 10.1039/D2MH01083F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements