A rheologist's guideline to data-driven recovery of complex fluids' parameters from constitutive models

Abstract

Rheology-informed neural networks (RhINNs) have recently been popularized as data-driven platforms for solving rheologically relevant differential equations. While RhINNs can be employed to solve different constitutive equations of interest in a forward or inverse manner, their ability to do so strictly depends on the type of data and the choice of models embedded within their structure. Here, the applicability of RhINNs in general, and the interplay between the choice of models, parameters of the neural network itself, and the type of data at hand are studied. To do so, a RhINN is informed by a series of thixotropic elasto-visco-plastic (TEVP) constitutive models, and its ability to accurately recover model parameters from stress growth and oscillatory shear flow protocols is investigated. We observed that by simplifying the constitutive model, RhINN convergence is improved in terms of parameter recovery accuracy and computation speed while over-simplifying the model is detrimental to accuracy. Moreover, several hyperparameters, e.g., the learning rate, activation function, initial conditions for the fitting parameters, and error heuristics, should be at the top of the checklist when aiming to improve parameter recovery using RhINNs. Finally, the given data form plays a pivotal role, and no convergence is observed when one set of experiments is used as the given data for either of the flow protocols. The range of parameters is also a limiting factor when employing RhINNs for parameter recovery, and ad hoc modifications to the constitutive model can be trivial remedies to guarantee convergence when recovering fitting parameters with large values.