Issue 1, 2022

Scattering versus fluorescence self-quenching: more than a question of faith for the quantification of water flux in large unilamellar vesicles?

Abstract

The endeavors to understand the determinants of water permeation through membrane channels, the effect of the lipid or polymer membrane on channel function, the development of specific water flow inhibitors, the design of artificial water channels and aquaporins for the use in industrial water filtration applications all rely on accurate ways to quantify water permeabilities (Pf). A commonly used method is to reconstitute membrane channels into large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) and to subject these vesicles to an osmotic gradient in a stopped-flow device. Fast recordings of either scattered light intensity or fluorescence self-quenching signals are taken as a readout for vesicle volume change, which in turn can be recalculated to accurate Pf values. By means of computational and experimental data, we discuss the pros and cons of using scattering versus self-quenching experiments or subjecting vesicles to hypo- or hyperosmotic conditions. In addition, we explicate for the first time the influence of the LUVs size distribution, channel distribution between vesicles and remaining detergent after protein reconstitution on Pf values. We point out that results such as the single channel water permeability (pf) depend on the membrane matrix or on the direction of the applied osmotic gradient may be direct results of the measurement and analysis procedure.

Graphical abstract: Scattering versus fluorescence self-quenching: more than a question of faith for the quantification of water flux in large unilamellar vesicles?

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
24 Jul 2021
Accepted
16 Oct 2021
First published
18 Oct 2021
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Nanoscale Adv., 2022,4, 58-76

Scattering versus fluorescence self-quenching: more than a question of faith for the quantification of water flux in large unilamellar vesicles?

J. Wachlmayr, C. Hannesschlaeger, A. Speletz, T. Barta, A. Eckerstorfer, C. Siligan and A. Horner, Nanoscale Adv., 2022, 4, 58 DOI: 10.1039/D1NA00577D

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements