Issue 36, 2022

Accurate computed singlet–triplet energy differences for cobalt systems: implication for two-state reactivity

Abstract

Accurate singlet–triplet energy differences for cobalt and rhodium complexes were calculated by using several wave function methods, such as MRCISD, CASPT2, CCSD(T) and BCCD(T). Relaxed energy differences were obtained by considering the singlet and triplet complexes, each at the minimum of their potential energy surfaces. Active spaces for multireference calculations were carefully checked to provide accurate results. The considered systems are built by increasing progressively the first coordination sphere around the metal. We included in our set two CpCoX complexes (Cp = cyclopentadienyl, X = alkenyl ligand), which have been suggested as intermediates in cycloaddition reactions. Indeed, cobalt systems have been used for more than a decade as active species in this kind of transformations, for which a two-state reactivity has been proposed. Most of the considered systems display a triplet ground state. However, in the case of a reaction intermediate, while a triplet ground state was predicted on the basis of Density Functional Theory results, our calculations suggest a singlet ground state. This stems from the competition between the exchange term (stabilising the triplet) and the accessibility of an intramolecular coordination (stabilising the singlet). This finding has an impact on the general mechanism of the cycloaddition reaction. Analogous rhodium systems were also studied and, as expected, they have a larger tendency to electron pairing than cobalt species.

Graphical abstract: Accurate computed singlet–triplet energy differences for cobalt systems: implication for two-state reactivity

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
18 Jul 2022
Accepted
31 Aug 2022
First published
01 Sep 2022
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022,24, 21841-21852

Accurate computed singlet–triplet energy differences for cobalt systems: implication for two-state reactivity

L. Chaussy, D. Hagebaum-Reignier, S. Humbel and P. Nava, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 21841 DOI: 10.1039/D2CP03291K

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements