Issue 2, 2022

Happy photocatalysts and unhappy photocatalysts: electron trap-distribution analysis for metal oxide-sample identification

Abstract

A strange story, including a new concept of identification of inorganic solid materials and of photocatalyst design, is told here. Why is it that solid materials have not been identified, while organic chemists are required to identify their organic compounds for publication of a report? What is the meaning of identification? Why is it almost impossible to identify inorganic solids? Is it possible to identify an inorganic solid by using a certain fingerprint? Can energy-resolved distribution of electron traps (ERDT) patterns be fingerprint of solid materials? What do ERDT/CBB (conduction-band bottom) patterns tell us about the photocatalytic activity of titania samples?

Graphical abstract: Happy photocatalysts and unhappy photocatalysts: electron trap-distribution analysis for metal oxide-sample identification

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
28 Oct 2021
Accepted
22 Nov 2021
First published
22 Nov 2021
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Catal. Sci. Technol., 2022,12, 354-359

Happy photocatalysts and unhappy photocatalysts: electron trap-distribution analysis for metal oxide-sample identification

B. Ohtani and M. Takashima, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2022, 12, 354 DOI: 10.1039/D1CY01955D

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements