Issue 1, 2019

Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks

Abstract

This paper focuses on the procedure and results for analyzing text-difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks in the Czech Republic. The authors use established methodology for text-difficulty analysis by Nestler, adapted by Průcha and Pluskal by adding a second independent analyser to improve reliability. Some textbooks do not follow the expected trend of either text-difficulty coherence or increasing text-difficulty between books for the 8th and 9th grade. No trend in topic difficulty was found either. The results show that learning outcomes may differ significantly when different books are used, despite the fact that they are supposed to support the same curriculum. For this reason, the results serve to support not only teachers when selecting a textbook, but also researchers as a starting point for lesson observations.

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
03 Jun 2018
Accepted
07 Aug 2018
First published
07 Aug 2018

Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2019,20, 85-94

Analysis of text difficulty in lower-secondary chemistry textbooks

M. Rusek and K. Vojíř, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2019, 20, 85 DOI: 10.1039/C8RP00141C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements