Correction: New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl2 bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl2 backbonding vs. the IR νCN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(II) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study

Girolamo Casella; Célia Fonseca Guerra; Silvia Carlotto; Paolo Sgarbossa; Roberta Bertani; Maurizio Casarin

doi:10.1039/C9DT90189B

Correction: New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl₂ bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl₂ backbonding vs. the IR ν_CN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(ii) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study

Girolamo Casella,*^ab Célia Fonseca Guerra,^cd Silvia Carlotto,^e Paolo Sgarbossa,^f Roberta Bertani^f and Maurizio Casarin^e

Author affiliations

* Corresponding authors

^a Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra e del Mare, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via Archirafi, 22, 90123 Palermo, Italy
E-mail: girolamo.casella@unipa.it

^b Consorzio Interuniversitario di Ricerca in Chimica dei Metalli nei Sistemi Biologici (C.I.R.C.M.S.B.) – Piazza Umberto I, 70121 Bari, Italy

^c Department of Theoretical Chemistry and Amsterdam Center for Multiscale Modeling, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

^d Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands

^e Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Padova, via F. Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy

^f Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università degli Studi di Padova, via F. Marzolo 9, 35131 Padova, Italy

Abstract

Correction for ‘New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl₂ bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl₂ backbonding vs. the IR ν_CN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(II) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study’ by Girolamo Casella et al., Dalton Trans., 2019, DOI: 10.1039/c9dt02440a.

Associated articles

Article information

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9DT90189B
Article type: Correction
Submitted: 19 Aug 2019
Accepted: 19 Aug 2019
First published: 27 Aug 2019
This article is Open Access

Download Citation

Dalton Trans., 2019,48, 13491-13492

Permissions

Request permissions

Correction: New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl₂ bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl₂ backbonding vs. the IR ν_CN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(II) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study

G. Casella, C. F. Guerra, S. Carlotto, P. Sgarbossa, R. Bertani and M. Casarin, Dalton Trans., 2019, 48, 13491 DOI: 10.1039/C9DT90189B

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Dalton Transactions

Correction: New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl₂ bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl₂ backbonding vs. the IR ν_CN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(ii) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study

Abstract

Associated articles

Article information

Download Citation

Permissions

Correction: New light on an old debate: does the RCN–PtCl₂ bond include any back-donation? RCN ← PtCl₂ backbonding vs. the IR ν_CN blue-shift dichotomy in organonitriles–platinum(II) complexes. A thorough density functional theory – energy decomposition analysis study

Social activity

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements

Dalton Transactions