Issue 20, 2019

Reliability of HF/IQA, B3LYP/IQA, and MP2/IQA data in interpreting the nature and strength of interactions

Abstract

Mainly focusing on the B3LYP level, the reliability of level of theory (LoT)-dependent IQA-defined energy terms (self- and additive atomic energies, interaction energy and its components) in interpreting interactions was investigated at three LoTs using default settings in AIMAll software explicitly implementing the actual B3LYP exchange–correlation functional. Reliability was quantified using relative errors (REs) defined as, for example, RE = B3LYP/IQA(computed) − B3LYP/IQA(expected), using reference CCSD/BBC1/IQA data to obtain the LoT/IQA(expected) terms. On average, B3LYP produced the most accurate IQA energies among the LoTs investigated, affording REs an order of magnitude smaller than those at the HF level. The B3LYP/IQA description of the O4⋯H6 and O3⋯O4 interactions in glycol conformers compared well with the CCSD/BBC1/IQA-generated picture. Exceptionally reliable data were obtained at the B3LYP level for changes in the IQA energies computed for structural changes in glycol. The FAMSEC-based interpretation produced exact qualitative description and perfectly quantitatively comparable values to CCSD/BBC1/IQA data. The ΔEIQA = ΔE criterion (representing changes between the final and any suitably selected initial structure of a molecular system) is reported to ‘validate’ or predict the usefulness of changes in the LoT/IQA computed energy terms with respect to interaction interpretability. This was supported by (i) the smallest errors in the IQA energy changes being obtained at MP2/Müller, despite EIQA largely overestimating E (by −170 kcal mol−1 due to large REs in self-atomic energies) and (ii) reasonable HF-generated FAMSEC descriptors, regardless of the largest REs in the HF/IQA data. Finally, adding Grimme's D3 empirical dispersion correction had no significant effect on the REs.

Graphical abstract: Reliability of HF/IQA, B3LYP/IQA, and MP2/IQA data in interpreting the nature and strength of interactions

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
14 Jan 2019
Accepted
18 Feb 2019
First published
19 Feb 2019

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019,21, 10244-10260

Reliability of HF/IQA, B3LYP/IQA, and MP2/IQA data in interpreting the nature and strength of interactions

I. Cukrowski, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 10244 DOI: 10.1039/C9CP00243J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements