Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 43, 2018
Previous Article Next Article

Reply to ‘Comment on “Angstrom-scale probing of paramagnetic centers location in nanodiamonds by 3He NMR at low temperatures”’ by A. Shames, V. Osipov and A. Panich, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, DOI: 10.1039/c8cp03331e

Author affiliations

Abstract

Shames et al. made a comment on our article (DOI: 10.1039/C7CP05898E) stating that their experience in EPR studies of detonation nanodiamonds suggests the existence of two main types of paramagnetic center in detonation nanodiamonds which questions our results. In this reply we provide insights into why there is only one main type of paramagnetic centers detected in nanodiamonds used in this work, which validates the correctness of the proposed original method to determine the distances between paramagnetic centers and nanoparticle surfaces by 3He NMR.

Graphical abstract: Reply to ‘Comment on “Angstrom-scale probing of paramagnetic centers location in nanodiamonds by 3He NMR at low temperatures”’ by A. Shames, V. Osipov and A. Panich, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, DOI: 10.1039/c8cp03331e

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 13 Sep 2018, accepted on 16 Oct 2018 and first published on 16 Oct 2018


Article type: Comment
DOI: 10.1039/C8CP05801F
Citation: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 27697-27699
  •   Request permissions

    Reply to ‘Comment on “Angstrom-scale probing of paramagnetic centers location in nanodiamonds by 3He NMR at low temperatures”’ by A. Shames, V. Osipov and A. Panich, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, DOI: 10.1039/c8cp03331e

    V. Kuzmin, K. Safiullin, G. Dolgorukov, A. Stanislavovas, E. Alakshin, B. Yavkin, S. Orlinskii, A. Klochkov and M. Tagirov, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 27697
    DOI: 10.1039/C8CP05801F

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements