Issue 38, 2018

Cu(i) vs. Ru(ii) photosensitizers: elucidation of electron transfer processes within a series of structurally related complexes containing an extended π-system

Abstract

Heteroleptic Cu(I) complexes are a promising alternative towards traditional Ru(II) photosensitizers. In particular, Cu(I) complexes of the type [Cu(P^P)(N^N)]+, where N^N represents a diimine and P^P a bulky diphosphine ligand, are already successfully applied for photocatalysis, organic light-emitting diodes or dye-sensitized solar cells. Therefore, this study aims for the systematic comparison of three novel heteroleptic Cu(I) compounds, composed of xantphos (xant) as P^P ligand and different diimine ligands with an extended π-system in the backbone, with their structurally related Ru(II) analogues. In these Ru(II) photosensitizers [Ru(bpy)2(N^N)]2+ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) the same N^N ligands were used, namely, dipyrido[3,2-f:2′,3′-h]quinoxaline (dpq) and dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (dppz). To gain an in-depth understanding of the photoinduced charge transfer processes, the photophysical features of these complexes and their electrochemically oxidized/reduced species were studied by a combination of UV-vis absorption, resonance Raman and spectroelectrochemistry. (TD)DFT calculations were applied to qualitatively analyze these measurements. As a result, the heteroleptic Cu(I) complexes exhibit comparable charge transfer properties to their Ru(II) analogues, i.e. upon visible light excitation they undergo a metal-to-ligand charge transfer to the diimine ligand(s). In contrast, the reduced Cu(I)– and Ru(II)–dppz complexes show considerably different electronic transitions. The singly reduced Cu(I)–dppz complexes are able to accumulate an additional electron at the phenanthroline moiety upon blue-light excitation, which is beneficial for multi-electron-transfer reactions. Upon low-energy light irradiation electronic transitions from the dppz anion to the xant ligand are excited, which could shorten the lifetime of the photosensitizer intermediates in an unwanted way.

Graphical abstract: Cu(i) vs. Ru(ii) photosensitizers: elucidation of electron transfer processes within a series of structurally related complexes containing an extended π-system

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
19 Jul 2018
Accepted
11 Sep 2018
First published
11 Sep 2018

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 24843-24857

Cu(I) vs. Ru(II) photosensitizers: elucidation of electron transfer processes within a series of structurally related complexes containing an extended π-system

Y. Zhang, P. Traber, L. Zedler, S. Kupfer, S. Gräfe, M. Schulz, W. Frey, M. Karnahl and B. Dietzek, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 24843 DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04595J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements