Issue 13, 2017

Comparative solution equilibrium studies of antitumor ruthenium(η6-p-cymene) and rhodium(η5-C5Me5) complexes of 8-hydroxyquinolines

Abstract

Complex formation processes of [Ru(η6-p-cymene)(H2O)3]+ and [Rh(η5-C5Me5)(H2O)3]+ organometallic cations with 8-hydroxyquinoline (HQ) ligands were studied in aqueous solution by the combined use of 1H NMR spectroscopy, UV-visible spectrophotometry and pH-potentiometry. Solution stability, chloride ion affinity and lipophilicity of the complexes were characterized together with the in vitro cytotoxicity against a pair of cancer cell lines, responsive and resistant to classic chemotherapy. The solid phase structure of the [Rh(η5-C5Me5)(8-quinolinolato)(Cl)] complex was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. In addition to the unsubstituted HQ its 7-(1-piperidinylmethyl) (PHQ) and 5-sulfonate (HQS) derivatives were involved. PHQ has a significant preference for targeting multidrug resistant cancer cell lines, while HQS served as a water soluble model compound. The equilibrium studies revealed the formation of mono[M(L)(H2O)] complexes with prominently high solution stability, which predominate at physiological pH even in the micromolar concentration range, and the formation of mixed hydroxido [M(L)(OH)] complexes was characterized by relatively high pKa values (8.5–10.3). In comparison to the Rh(η5-C5Me5) species the complexation process with Ru(η6-p-cymene) is much slower, and both the pKa values and the H2O/Cl co-ligand exchange constants are lower by 1–1.5 orders of magnitude. The stability order obtained for these organometallic complexes is as follows: HQS > HQ > PHQ. The cytotoxicity of the ligands and their Ru(η6-p-cymene) and Rh(η5-C5Me5) complexes was investigated against MES-SA (human uterine sarcoma) cell line and its multidrug resistant counterpart (MES-SA/Dx5). HQ and its complexes show similar cytotoxicity in both cell lines. In contrast, PHQ and its Rh(η5-C5Me5) complex are more potent against MES-SA/Dx5 cells, while this selectivity could not be observed for the Ru(η6-p-cymene) complex.

Graphical abstract: Comparative solution equilibrium studies of antitumor ruthenium(η6-p-cymene) and rhodium(η5-C5Me5) complexes of 8-hydroxyquinolines

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
04 Feb 2017
Accepted
03 Mar 2017
First published
03 Mar 2017
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Dalton Trans., 2017,46, 4382-4396

Comparative solution equilibrium studies of antitumor ruthenium(η6-p-cymene) and rhodium(η5-C5Me5) complexes of 8-hydroxyquinolines

O. Dömötör, V. F. S. Pape, N. V. May, G. Szakács and É. A. Enyedy, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 4382 DOI: 10.1039/C7DT00439G

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. You can use material from this article in other publications without requesting further permissions from the RSC, provided that the correct acknowledgement is given.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements