Issue 2, 2016

Comment on “Promising blood-derived biomarkers for estimation of the postmortem interval” by I. Costa, F. Carvalho, T. Magalhães, P. G. de Pinho, R. Silvestre & R. J. Dinis-Oliveira. (Toxicol. Res., 2015, 4, 1443–1452)

Abstract

Recently, Costa et al. published an article about promising biomarkers for estimating the postmortem interval. Instead of postmortem blood, antemortem blood was putrefied in vitro by exposing the blood to a temperature gradient. However, in this way several other influencing factors were excluded, hence, the accuracy of the proposed model is doubtful. Therefore, the aim of this comment is to discuss the methodology, results and shortcomings of the study of Costa et al.

Article information

Article type
Comment
Submitted
25 Oct 2015
Accepted
05 Jan 2016
First published
02 Feb 2016
This article is Open Access
Creative Commons BY license

Toxicol. Res., 2016,5, 714-715

Spotlight

Advertisements