Issue 78, 2016, Issue in Progress

Computational scrutiny of the effect of N-terminal proline and residue stereochemistry in the nucleation of α-helix fold

Abstract

The biasing of proteins as ordered folds specific to their polypeptide sequences remains unknown in its basis. Several studies of unfolded states in folding–unfolding equilibrium with oligoalanine models have established that the polypeptide structure will unfold as ensembles that largely sample PPII and β-conformations and that the effects internal to the main chain and that of the solvent envelope are critical. While unfolded to largely extended conformations, the folded proteins are a sequence-specific mixture of β and α-conformations. The specificity is unclear in its basis, and we addressed this during the past few years with statistical mechanical studies using appropriate simpler models. In the present study, oligopeptides are used as models to elucidate the effect of N-terminal modification in the sampling of the α-conformation. Specifically, equilibrium sampling of the models for the α-conformation is assessed for dependence on the force field and the effects of specific structure perturbation in the models. Thus, Ac–LAla4–NHMe (Ia), Ac–DAla–LAla3–NHMe (Ib), Ac–LPro–LAla3–NHMe (IIa), Ac–DPro–LAla3–NHMe (IIb), Ac–LPro2LAla2–NHMe (IIIa), and Ac–DPro–LPro–LAla2–NHMe (IIIb) are compared as N-terminal alanine or proline and L- or D-residue stereochemically perturbed models. These models are equilibrated in water as an explicit solvent using molecular dynamics, and the ordering of the polypeptide to the α-conformation is tested for the effect of force fields and the specific structural perturbation. The results of molecular dynamics ensembles imply an appreciable shift in the equilibrium sampling of conformations from the β + PPII basin to the α-basin of ϕ, ψ space, including ordering of helical microstates. The results involving well calibrated force fields imply that the ensembles appearing macroscopically as PPII helices have participating microstates that occasionally sample α-basins. We observed the nucleation of an α-helical fold with an N-terminal residue in the DPPII conformation in a mixed-L,D structure. The results imply that N-terminal L- to D-residue mutation is the stronger effect that induces folding than N-terminal alanine-to-proline or dialanine-to-diproline mutation. The present study will provide better understanding about the nucleation of helical folds in short peptides and will aid in the design of novel peptides with α-helical structures.

Graphical abstract: Computational scrutiny of the effect of N-terminal proline and residue stereochemistry in the nucleation of α-helix fold

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
27 Apr 2016
Accepted
19 Jul 2016
First published
19 Jul 2016

RSC Adv., 2016,6, 74162-74176

Author version available

Computational scrutiny of the effect of N-terminal proline and residue stereochemistry in the nucleation of α-helix fold

B. Goyal, A. Kumar, K. R. Srivastava and S. Durani, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 74162 DOI: 10.1039/C6RA10934A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements