Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Volume 189, 2016
Previous Article Next Article

Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research

Author affiliations


Low cost pollution sensors have been widely publicized, in principle offering increased information on the distribution of air pollution and a democratization of air quality measurements to amateur users. We report a laboratory study of commonly-used electrochemical sensors and quantify a number of cross-interferences with other atmospheric chemicals, some of which become significant at typical suburban air pollution concentrations. We highlight that artefact signals from co-sampled pollutants such as CO2 can be greater than the electrochemical sensor signal generated by the measurand. We subsequently tested in ambient air, over a period of three weeks, twenty identical commercial sensor packages alongside standard measurements and report on the degree of agreement between references and sensors. We then explore potential experimental approaches to improve sensor performance, enhancing outputs from qualitative to quantitative, focusing on low cost VOC photoionization sensors. Careful signal handling, for example, was seen to improve limits of detection by one order of magnitude. The quantity, magnitude and complexity of analytical interferences that must be characterised to convert a signal into a quantitative observation, with known uncertainties, make standard individual parameter regression inappropriate. We show that one potential solution to this problem is the application of supervised machine learning approaches such as boosted regression trees and Gaussian processes emulation.

Back to tab navigation

Associated articles

Additions and corrections

Article information

30 Nov 2015
15 Dec 2015
First published
15 Dec 2015

Faraday Discuss., 2016,189, 85-103
Article type

Evaluating the performance of low cost chemical sensors for air pollution research

A. C. Lewis, J. D. Lee, P. M. Edwards, M. D. Shaw, M. J. Evans, S. J. Moller, K. R. Smith, J. W. Buckley, M. Ellis, S. R. Gillot and A. White, Faraday Discuss., 2016, 189, 85
DOI: 10.1039/C5FD00201J

Social activity

Search articles by author