Issue 6, 2014

Are proteins a redundant ontology? Epistemological limitations in the analysis of multistate species

Abstract

Advances in proteomics have exponentially increased the numbers of post-translational modifications identified, the resulting volume of data is overwhelming both databases and empiricists. We review methodologies for chemical and functional PTM assignment. Using β-oxidation as a paradigm, we discuss epistemic limitations and conceptual approaches to resolving them combining relational biology, proteomics, and the erosion of “protein” and “metabolite” as distinct ontologies.

Graphical abstract: Are proteins a redundant ontology? Epistemological limitations in the analysis of multistate species

Article information

Article type
Opinion
Submitted
06 Dec 2013
Accepted
24 Jan 2014
First published
24 Jan 2014

Mol. BioSyst., 2014,10, 1228-1235

Author version available

Are proteins a redundant ontology? Epistemological limitations in the analysis of multistate species

B. M. Corfe and C. A. Evans, Mol. BioSyst., 2014, 10, 1228 DOI: 10.1039/C3MB70558G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements